and there is a need for volunteers .” Moreover , he said that it is too early to declare that we won the war and get enthusiastic about that ( News in аrmenia today : Nagorno Кarabakh latest NEWS ).
The last interview during the war was conducted with the leader of the Armenian Democratic Party Aram Sargsyan on November 9th . The main questions discussed during the interview were Turkey ’ s expansionist policy in the South Caucasus , its support to Azerbaijan and Armenia ’ s diplomacy with foreign states that are also involved in conflict management . Sargsyan criticized the Armenian government for not officially requesting Russia ’ s assistance in the fight against global terrorism . Sargsyan also claimed that because of certain factors Russia has trust issues towards the Armenian government , and that also needs to be overcome for improving the Armenian-Russian relations . At the end , the guest required Armenian government ’ s accountability about the unfolding events and its steps towards facilitating the crisis management in the country . Sargsyan encouraged the government to request support or advice from experienced people , who have corresponding skills and knowledge and can be helpful in managing the situation ( News in аrmenia today : Nagorno Кarabakh latest NEWS ).
After analyzing all the interviews on “ Review ” it can be concluded that those were mainly criticizing and condemning the Turkish-Azerbaijani aggression towards Armenia and Artsakh . The guests were mainly speaking about the adversary ’ s war crimes , as well as violation of all the international norms and rules . It can be noted that there was some difference in the interviews at the beginning and at the end of the war . At the beginning , the interviewees were mainly avoiding any criticism of the Armenian government and its functioning throughout the period when the country was at war . However , starting from the 26th day of the war , some of the interviewees expressed grievances and concerns about the Armenian government ’ s inability in handling the situation and in responding to the adversary ’ s military and political pressures .
The Framing of Factor TV
The section analyzes the interviews on Factor TV , particularly on the program “ Yerevani Jamanakov ” throughout the duration of the war . As noted in the methodology section , this media outlet is independent , mainly donor-funded and has a pro-government narrative . Compared to the previous two media outlets , this one was not that active and aired only a few interviews during the war . This section aims at understanding if the narrative of the interviews was mainly supportive of the government , or if there was any case of questioning the messages of Pashinyan .
80