Liverpool Law Bulletin December 2013 December 2013 | Page 9
Council Member’s Report
I have been to council meeting , and I have been trying to support criminal lawyer colleagues who of
course have massive and justifiable concerns in respect of the Government’s attack on their livelihood, way
of life, and future. I have not had the time to puts thoughts into a complete article. I apologise for this. I
will do this for the next issue, but in the meantime I attach two reports from Law Society Council meeting
on 16 October. As ever, if you have any concerns, please contact me : [email protected]
Law Society Council meeting
summary: 16 October 2013
At this first Council meeting of the
legal year 2013-14, we welcomed the
19 new members of Council who had
been elected or nominated to Council
seats earlier in the year, the great
majority of whom were able to attend
their first Council meeting in person.
There were a number of important
matters on the Council agenda which
this document attempts to summarise
for wider circulation.
The future of regulation
We submitted a response, adopted by
the Society’s Regulatory Affairs Board,
to the Lord Chancellor's call for
evidence on regulating the profession.
The key elements of our preferred
way forward are:
•Return responsibility for standard
setting and education to the
professional bodies
•Revise the Internal Governance Rules
to clarify responsibilities, giving the
professional bodies clearer
accountability for their arm's-length
regulator
•Reduce the size and scope of the
oversight regulator, which would be
chaired by a judge.
Council discussed these proposals and
the strands of work that would be
required for implementation if they
were adopted by the Ministry of
Justice. These include defining which
functions would transfer, how the
rules would need to be amended, and
how to address practical issues
including organisation design.
Criminal Legal Aid
In a wide-ranging debate, Council
considered the Society's position, and
what the next steps should be. The
Law Society opposed the model for
the procurement of legal aid originally
proposed in the Transforming Legal
Aid consultation paper. In particular:
•We opposed the removal of client
choice.
•We opposed the introduction of
Price-Competitive Tendering (PCT).
•We sought to ensure that that
greatest possible number of firms
could sustainably deliver criminal legal
aid in the medium term.
Updates on other issues
Some of the discussions in Council
related to how it oversees the
Society's activities and operations, for
example continuing updates on
measures to improve the internal
control regime, and a business case to
support moving to a much more
'joined up' and effective suite of IT
systems.
Engaging and shaping our
environment
The CEO, accompanied by the
relevant regional manager, made visits
to firms in Suffolk, South Hampshire,
Hertfordshire, and Greater London.
The Law Society maintained its
customary presence at the American
Bar Association annual conference,
hosting a seminar for international bar
leaders on regulation of the legal
profession.
Council Report
On civil litigation issues, the Chief
Executive appeared before the
Transport Select Committee, and the
President met with the relevant MoJ
minister to express our views.
On equality and diversity, we have
worked with Riliance to develop a
free online tool to enable firms to
collect, report and publish data on the
diversity of their workforce as
required by the SRA. As at the end of
August, nearly 900 firms had
registered for this.
Commercial affairs
We have conducted research with
275 small and medium practices to
understand the importance of various
support functions and business
services provided to them. This will
inform plans for the delivery of
consultancy and other services for
2014. Activity has continued to
deliver high quality services to section
members, to improve the offering to
Law Society divisions, to build the
marketing and communications
strategy to support the launch of the
Wills Inheritance Quality Scheme, and
to support the launch of Chancery
Pii. The Practice Advice Service has
received over 7,500 calls over the last
three months and has been important
in supporting firms with advice on
Professional Indemnity Insurance. The
new Gazette website has been well
received by users.
Update on Criminal Legal Aid
On 16 October, the Law Society Council resolved to:
1. Note and support the concessions and amendments to the Government’s
initial proposals that have been achieved via the Society’s engagement with the
MoJ.
2. Note that the Society opposes uneconomic or inappropriate fee structures.
2.This short paper summarises the presentation given to Council. It sets out
what has changed between the April and September consultations as a result of
the Society’s engagement, the detail of the new proposals and the Society’s
position going forward.
The MoJ’s original proposals
3.On 9 April, the MoJ presented a consultation document proposing a radical
restructuring of criminal legal aid procurement. That document proposed:
3.1