LIMOUSIN TODAY | Page 128

Management of feed to a pound of gain. About half of the OSU herd is Angus; the other half is black baldy. “Also, recent research points out that modest selection pressure to reduce the genetic potential for milk production will likely better match commercial cows to their forage resources and reduce cost of production,” Lalman says. He explains it takes 30 to 60 pounds of milk to get one more pound of weaning weight gain. And it can take 80 to 90 pounds of cow feed (or forage) to get 1 more pound of calf gain. “One possible explanation for flat weaning weights is that the potential of grazing resources to support more milk production in a commercial beef cow may be maxed out in a lot of situations,” Lalman says. He points to increasingly accurate selection tools and the plethora of available curve- bending genetics that enable producers to reduce cost and add value at the same time. “We can make progress on low-cost cows while making progress on postweaning performance and quality. We can improve the reputation and price for the calf, while making cows that are pretty low-cost. We need to understand that we can do both,” Lalman says. Capturing genetic value Supposing weaning weight remains stagnant, and costs are already whittled to a nub. There’s added incentive to capture the value of genetic potential for superior postweaning performance, as suggested by the study. Many producers already are, of course. Arguably, there’s never been more market- based differentiation than there is today. Price differences continue to be cleaved by cattle of the same weight, sex and class, based on everything from making calves eligible for specific breed- and management-based value-added programs to documenting the genetic potential of calves for feedlot and carcass merit. LT This article was reprinted with permission from the BEEF Magazine. 126 | JUNE/JULY 2019 Photo by Sarah Johnson