Lighthouse Trails Research Journal VOL. 5 | NO. 6 | Page 5

Lighthouse Trails Research Journal 5 HUNDREDS OF PROTESTANT SCHOLARS AND PASTORS SIGN “REFORMING CATHOLIC CONFESSION,” BUT CAN THE CHURCH TRUST THIS DOCUMENT? BY LT EDITORS undreds of Protestant and evangeli- cal scholars, pastors, and theologians have signed a document called “Reforming Catholic Confession” to mark the 500 th anniversary of the Reformation, which was commemorated on October 31, 2017. Ac- cording to Dr. Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School in Birmingham, Alabama, who co-chaired the Confession’s steering committee, “a significant motivat- ing factor of the Confession’s participants is to call the Church to spiritual renewal.” 1 In reviewing the “Reforming Catholic Confession” 2 and the signatories, Light- house Trails has observed a few things, which lead us to ask, “Can the church trust the “Reforming Catholic Confession”? To begin with, the majority of the hun- dreds of initial signatories either promote the contemplative prayer movement (a movement that has its roots in Catholic mysticism and panentheism and is draw- ing Protestants in that direction) directly themselves or represent institutions or de- nominations that do. This promotion of contemplative spiritu- ality includes the Confession’s co-chair, Dr. Timothy George.  For example, in a 2014 article titled “Not Just For Catholics” 3 on Beeson Divinity School’s website, written by George, he expresses his admiration for Catholic practices such as the contemplative Lectio Divina. George is also the general editor for a series called the Reformation Commentary on Scripture (published by InterVarsity Press) that boasts of including Catholic writers in its collection of com- mentaries. While the “Reforming Catholic Confession” claims to be trying to strengthen the Protestant church and its unique mission separated from the Catholic Church, how can we trust a document whose co-chairman does not even understand the serious reasons Christians must be separated from the Ro- man Catholic Church? We know Timothy H Volume 5—No. 6 George cannot understand this, for if he did, he would certainly not, as the general editor, allow the writings of Catholic writers in a commentary series on Scripture. On the Beeson Divinity School website, George is described as  “active in Evangelical–Roman Catholic Church dialogue.” Leith Anderson, president of the Nation- al Association of Evangelicals (NAE), is an- other signatory of the “Reforming Catholic Confession.” Anderson was a pioneer of the emerging church movement as described in Roger Oakland’s book Faith Undone, which quotes Anderson saying he is hoping for a paradigm shift within the church: The only way to cope and be effective during this period of structural change in society is to change some of the ways we view our world and the church. It is what some call a paradigm shift—a new way of looking at something. Such a shift will allow us to view our changing world with new perspective. It is like a map. Old maps from 1950 may have sufficed before the construction of interstate highways and the expansion of major cities, but new maps are needed now. Likewise, we need a paradigm shift for the future. 4 (emphasis added) It was Leith Anderson, Rick Warren, and Bill Hybels who were instrumental in helping Bob Buford (under the inspiration of Peter Drucker) launch the emergent church (then called Terra Nova) around 1998 with a group of young pastors: Doug Pagitt, Dan Kimball, Mark Driscoll, and Brian McLaren. Things have never been the same since, which leads us to ask the question: Is the “Reforming Catholic Con- fession” (which uses the word “catholic” over 30 times) another step in this emergent paradigm shift that Leith Anderson longed for twenty years ago where “a new way of looking at something [the church]” comes into play? Those who have studied the emergent/emerging church in the scope of Scripture know it is a definite road to Rome with its ecumenical, interspiritual, and mystical elements leading the way. Other institutions that are represented in the signatures of the “Reforming Catho- lic Confession” are some of the most blatant contemplative-promoting Christian col- leges and universities out there. And when we say contemplative, remember, we mean on a path to Rome: Wheaton College, Fuller Theological Seminary, Biola Uni- versity, Bethel College, Regent University, Asbury University, Andrews University, Denver University, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, and Calvin Insti- tute of Christian Worship. Other schools represented in the document are also con- templative promoting: Dallas Theological Seminary, Liberty University, Moody Bible Institute, Baylor University, Cornerstone University, and Westmont College. We’ve only named a few of the institutions that are represented on the signature list that promote contemplative spirituality (i.e., the emergent churc h). As we stated, it is the majority of them that do. Several denominations are also repre- sented in the “Reforming Catholic Confes- sion” such as the Evangelical Free Church of America (and as of more recent years is now an advocate for contemplative spiritu- ality). And don’t think that these signatures representing these groups are insignificant non-influential back-room members. For instance, the man from the Evangelical Free Church of America who signed the document is Rev. Greg Strand whose title is the Executive Director of Theology & Credentialing for the denomination. Not to mention that the president of that de- nomination, Rev. Kevin Kompelien, also signed the Confession. Concludes on next page November/December 2017