Less Known, Clean, Low Cost, Abundant Energy Technologies & Related.. & Related World Changing Applications. | Page 299

Copy-Paste 1
• ■ TERAHERTZ(vague defini,on: 0.1 or 0.3 - 3,10, or 30Thz) vs FAR
INFRARED(3-30Thz), vs "CHARGED "CARBON, vs ELECTRON EMITTER
• Thz vs FIR SIMILARITY : A-Crossed over frequency, B-Par,ally Mainstream
Science illegal medical & bioac,va,on effects(substan,al enough to replace
part of mainstream medical with low cost if publicly endorsed), C-Self micro
electric current genera,on effects(media level pseudoscience),
• Thz vs FIR DIFFERENCE:Imprin?ng method: FIR(Far InfraRed) wave or its bio-
mineral info imprinted Ceramic, Fibre, or Plas,c some,mes differ from Thz
copying method(EMbalance.com, gaiapower jp, KWD.jp, Akatsuka FFC,
WorldKlass, Biopower gear+),
A-In Thz, Super/SubCri,cal water treatment is used more oPen, while in FIR,
Mixing & Baking method seemed to be more predominant: Original bacteria
or mineral to be imprinted is baked with ceramic at 1000-1300°C, so living
organism is supposedly dead, yet its “informa,on”, or FIR oscilla,on is
imprinted into new medium, & new FIR frequency generated ion is emiXed
from copied medium/device for 1-5yrs, or max 20yrs+,
B-Thz uses mineral nanopar,cle fuse method more frequently than
FIR(material is “fused” with substrate, not surface layered coa,ng).
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
299