Less Known, Clean, Low Cost, Abundant Energy Technologies & Related.. & Related World Changing Applications. | Page 270

Bio
29: Measuring BioEnergetic Field Effect
• ->>cont: BioEnergetic field: ■β: Field affecting: vi-Non contact Healing:
• Because of alleged significant performance gap by practitioner(this factor is
conveniently ignored by mainstream & sometimes used to debunk entire healers
claims), large control sample research of high performer for serious chronic
disease is very difficult with current funding/profit structure(some exception in
China), while mainstream will call such test "Immoral"(they declare nonlocality
cannot have any physical effect etc), & can easily obfuscate experiments by
pressuring to set conditions that are design to have weaker effect(speculating from
other medical tampering & numerous consistent examples of disruptive energy tech
experiment tampering by mainstream or its supporting & parasitic groups).
• This issue can be equated to exaggerated example of marathon running in which
not all runners(e.g. equating as healer) necessarily runs marathon under 2h20mins
(e.g. equivalent of meaning as strong healing effect), and some run at 3hrs(eg barely
marginal effect), and large majority runs marathon at 3.5hrs and more (eg zero
effect or worse). So if randomly select 10 marathon runners(eg healers) to test "in
order to get fair controlled results" as average, there might be no effect at all, or
one or two strong effect would become "statistical error" - hence still no effect at all.
Furthermore, gathering of high performance healers itself would become "selective
data" and becomes void as qualified research by "trusted scientific protocol".
-->>cont:
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
270