Leadership magazine Sept/Oct 2014 V 44 No 1 | Page 17

2. Further, parent and student involvement in budgeting can have a ripple effect for community involvement. Engaged parents and students are more likely to take ownership in other arenas, such as fundraising and event publicity. 3. Most importantly, including students and parents in the decision-making process is the best way to ensure that those decisions are truly student-centered. Parents and students possess expertise on what students need to succeed that districts alone simply don’t have access to, and they are ready and waiting to share this expertise as authentic partners in the planning process. LCFF sets forth minimum legal requirements for how districts must engage with their communities. This framework is important but narrow. Authentic engagement requires systemic changes far beyond these standards. Now that districts have completed the first round of LCAP development, it’s time to discover how districts have used this historic opportunity. We hope districts will re-evaluate their own processes and learn from each others’ innovations to fulfill the promise of LCFF’s game-changing reform. In addition to listing LCFF’s legal guidelines (“The bar”), we highlight best practices for authentically engaging students and parents beyond these requirements (“Raising the bar”). n Stakeholder consultations The bar: School boards must consult with teachers, principals, administrators, other school personnel, local bargaining units of the school district, parents and students in developing the LCAP. Raising the bar: • Request input on the process: Districts with the most successful engagement efforts partnered with community organizations to set dates and design procedures. San Francisco Unified School District worked with the Close the Gap Coalition to gather input before scheduling any sessions. • Hold meetings across the district: San Diego Unified School District hosted 16 “cluster” meetings, with each cluster representing one high school and the middle and elementary schools that fed into it. Listening sessions are most effe ctive when the district provides childcare and refreshment for families. • Administer surveys: Although surveys shouldn’t replace community conversations, broadly distributed surveys are an efficient way of gathering information. Sacramento City Unified School District provided online and paper surveys in six different languages, with questions broken down into the eight priority areas. More than 1,200 stakeholders responded. • Track involvement: After community members in Sacramento City Unified completed their surveys, the website graphically displayed response results. For example, pie charts showed what percentage of responders had children who were English learners or foster youth. • Educate stakeholders : Community members can’t be effective partners unless they understand what the law says and what the budget means. Salinas City Elementary School District provided English and Spanish trainings for parents about LCFF and the LCAP. n Advisory committees Raising the bar: • Ensure true representation: Members of advisory committees should represent the racial/ethnic backgrounds, income levels, schools and neighborhoods of the district. Parents of LCFF’s target groups (low-income children, foster youth and English learners) should comprise a significant majority. Pasadena USD published rosters of its committee members along with information about these critical characteristics. • Make the selection process transparent: Communities are more likely to trust the LCAP process when they understand how their district chose members of its committees. Pasadena Unified asked parents to apply based on publicized criteria that ensured committees’ representativeness. • Create a SAC (Student Advisory Committee): Getting student input through a formal structure like a SAC is an effective way to understand the diverse needs of students by providing a space where adults do not overshadow student opinions. The SAC should be representative of the district population, and can be put in charge of conducting student focus groups or surveys, and getting input from the students who serve on the school site councils. Oakland Unified is implementing this model of student engagement in the upcoming school year. • Provide data: Districts have empowered members of the committees by providing information about student data and expenditures. Sacramento City Unified made data related to each priority area available online and in handouts at the Advisory Committee meetings. • Invest in capacity building: Districts should ensure committee members have the tools to critically engage in the LCAP process, including training and staff support to its committees. n Public comments The bar: Each district must have a PAC (Parent Advisory Committee) and, if the district has 15 percent or more English learner students, an English Language Parent Advisory Committee (ELPAC). The district must present the draft LCAP to the advisory committees and respond in writing to any comments. The bar: Districts must provide an opportunity for members of the public to provide written comments regarding the specific actions and expenditures proposed by the district in the LCAP. Districts must also hold two meetings in which members of the public can provide public comment: a pub- September/October 2014 17