Leadership magazine Nov/Dec 2016 V46 No. 2 | Page 34

What ‘pay to play’ ruling means for school leadership The Supreme Court ruling in McDonnell v. United States limited the quid pro quo element in Virginia law and has relevance to state and local anticorruption statutes and ensuring pay-to-play politics does not pollute public school districts. 34 Leadership In an 8-0 decision, the United States Supreme Court threw out the bribery convictions of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, whom a trial court jury found performed official acts in exchange for gifts, or quid pro quo – “this for that.” The Supreme Court found that the jury was instructed on an overly broad definition of the “official act” element of federal anti-corruption statute. The court held an official act involves a formal exercise of government power and must also be something specific that is “pending” or “may by be brought” before a public official. The holding effectively limited the “quo” or “that” element of the statute. The more conservative justices focused on a strict interpretation of the statutory language, while almost all justices expressed concern about the potential of politically motivated prosecutions. The justices’ questioning demonstrated a healthy diversity in their life experiences, ideologies and temperament that theoretically would give rise to a well-reasoned decision. However, the decision’s aftermath may cause a sinister cancer on the American body politic to metastasize. With the highest court in the land adopting a limited interpretation of what constitutes an official act, the court may unwittingly condone or encourage the type of inf luence peddling that has repulsed the electorate. Does the opinion ignore the practicalities of local politics or endorse them? With trust in government at a historic low, is it practical to characterize otherwise dishonest or distasteful acts as “a basic compact underlying representative government?” Or, as Chief Justice John Roberts said, will the “more bounded” interpretation leave sufficient room for prosecuting corruption? Certainly, the impact of the McDonnell v. United States decision will resonate from the halls of the Supreme Court all the way to the modest closed session meeting rooms of California public schools. This article will analyze the McDonnell case, the decisio