Leadership magazine Nov/Dec 2016 V46 No. 2 | Page 23

An administrator’s job must be to first positively shape the culture and climate of a school so that the institution is a bastion where children are excited to learn. istrator must not only address safety concerns, they must attack them with haste to force rapid change and compliance. Once reported to the proper authorities, compliance issues were quickly resolved. However, damage to the reputation and climate of the school was irreversible. Element 3B: Plans and Procedures Today, administrators are expected to implement a vision for their campus that will allow students to graduate career ready or college bound. Both the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards are rooted in the idea of college and career readiness and are said to offer administrators the starting blocks from which to push. A strong and viable curriculum can be viewed as the most important determinant of student success. However, a solid curriculum is at first dependent on a positive school climate that supports and respects each student in a safe and clean learning environment. The idea of spending countless millions to overhaul educational standards to focus on college and career readiness has become a political hot topic from both sides of the aisle. It is, in fact, an unnecessary argument. A successful administrator’s worth has always been measured by the achievements of their pupils after graduation and/or the total number of graduates. CCSS/NGSS are not groundbreaking standards, rather they’re merely a gratuitous reminder of a time honored goal. When John Bliss arrived on campus at Folsom Middle School, he inherited an IEP process that was not efficient and worried about the school’s ability to produce students who were ready for high school and, indeed, life after graduation. The connection between general education and special education was all but severed, and parents and teachers shared the frustration of educational inertia. According to CPSEL 3B-4, leaders will “engage stakeholders in using problem solving and decision making processes and distributed leadership to develop, monitor, evaluate, and revise plans and programs.” Building a relationship first with special education allowed for a painless implementation of Bliss’ vision and formed the structural backbone of the Leadership Triangle. Bliss knew what needed to be addressed and modified what his responsibility was in making it happen. He describes his role as change agent in what at first seemed like an November | December 2016 23