Leadership magazine May/June 2018 V47 No. 5 | Page 17

work temporarily, but it will not create sus- tainability or develop self-efficacy. Instead, we must connect with teachers where they are and foster intrinsic motiva- tion. Daniel Pink, author of “Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us,” indicates that people are motivated by three things: purpose, mastery and auton- omy. We must consider each of these actions as we work with resistant teachers. Purpose We are often reminded as leaders to start with a “why,” a strong, compelling vision that drives our work. However, resistant teachers may not agree with our vision. In order to foster intrinsic motivation, we must instead start with “who.” We must connect with educators and align their own purpose to our vision. We could mandate all educators imple- ment a learning management system (LMS) in their classrooms because we believe it will maximize efficiency and increase student engagement. Yet an educator who is resistant to technology may not own our vision, stat- ing that there is no reason to change what has always worked. Instead of starting with our “why,” we must first start with the “who,” the educa- tor involved. When we connect with this educator, when we work to build a respectful relationships and visit his or her classroom on a regular basis, we may discover that he or she has a passion for engaging students in academic conversations and debates. This educator firmly believes that his or her purpose is to teach students to commu- nicate respectfully in research-based, intel- lectual discussions. Now we have an in. At this point, we can direct the teacher to the LMS that enables him or her to extend aca- demic conversations beyond school hours via safe, online communication. We can then encourage the educator to level up the academic conversations even fur- ther by recommending digital platforms that allow students to audibly record their voices in a collaborative space. In doing this, we at- tach the technology to the educator’s purpose. In this example, we start with “who” and follow with a corresponding “why.” Tech- nology is now relevant to context. It is inte- grated, used as a tool to accelerate learning Teachers and students alike, working together with technology as a tool, can create learning experiences that guide hesitant teachers toward proficiency. according to the vision of the educator. Mastery We often hear educators say, “But I’m not good at technology!” Educators who do not believe they have the capacity to achieve mastery will not be intrinsically motivated to move forward. Professional learning and job-embedded coaching must be a part of any technology integration plan. This goes beyond sit and get PD. Tech-re- sistant teachers are fearful. We must provide them with support. The most effective ap- proach includes modeling, co-teaching, and lesson study practices. This in-person guid- ance can turn a vocal, tech-resistant teacher into an advocate for technology integration. Educational leaders often do not have the financ