Figures
Figure 1 Format of this report including appendices.................................................................... 12 Figure 2 Hillslope Gully Erosion in the Burdekin River Basin........................................................ 14 Figure 3 Alluvial Gully Erosion in the Burdekin River Basin.......................................................... 14 Figure 4 Pannell ' s public private benefit framework.................................................................... 27 Figure 5 Incentives need to be matched to landholders and sediment reduction benefit.......... 36
Figure 6 Potential incentive mix supporting the spectrum of landholders to improved practices........................................................................................................................................ 44
Apx Figure B. 1 The influences of adoption................................................................................... 72 Apx Figure C. 1 Offsets within the mitigation hierarchy................................................................ 89
Tables
Table 1 Current and desirable management practices for sediment management( Park and Dickson, 2015)............................................................................................................................... 15
Table 2 What does the literature and landholders say influence adoption of practice change? 16
Table 3 Graziers perspectives on barriers to land management practice adoption and strategies to overcome these........................................................................................................................ 17
Table 4 Types of incentives........................................................................................................... 20 Table 5 Considering incentives from first principles..................................................................... 29 Table 6 Market failures and what this means for incentive mechanisms in the BBB.................. 34 Table 7 Potential incentives for the LDC....................................................................................... 41
Apx Table A. 1 Erosion management practice changes proposed................................................ 64
Apx Table A. 2 Comments on whether incentives to landholders seem sensible given the practice characteristics identified in Table 1( and subject to an assessment of sediment erosion benefits per public cost).................................................................................................. 67
Apx Table C. 1: Key Strengths and challenges of extension / suasion / social recognition style incentives...................................................................................................................................... 79
Apx Table C. 2 Key Strengths and challenges of brokering as an incentive.................................. 79 Apx Table C. 3 Key Strengths and challenges of product differentiation as an incentive............. 80
Landholders driving change: Exploring new incentives | iii