Practice |
Min std
for
incentive
|
Current average practice |
Best practical practice |
Private benefit( H, M, L, 0 or negative) |
Public benefit( H, M, L, 0) |
Technical feasibility( H, M, L, 0) |
Adoptability( H, M, L, 0, negative) |
Nonprofit related barriers |
Upfront cost
($/ unit)
|
On-going maintenance costs needed?($/ unit) |
Should incentives to landholders be considered? |
Remediation of active gullies- major works including reshaping |
|
M but less well established than for hillslope gullies |
Zero to negative |
N / A |
$ 18 million($ 60,000 / ha and 300 ha gullies on a 20,000 ha farm( Brooks, pers. comm.) |
Probably yes |
Probably no |
Streambank erosion |
Management of stock on frontage country to achieve end of dry season ground cover targets |
C |
C-D( Park and Dickson, 2015)
C- B( Waterhouse et al., 2017)
|
|
No or small – landholders should maintain fences |
Yes |
Engineered stream bank toe protection or bed protection |
Engineering success will be highly dependent on upstream measures – best decided by NQDT or DNRME and not landholders |
$ 143,880 / km for battering and up to over $ 5 million / km if major rock structures are needed( Bartley et al., 2015) |
Probably yes |
No |