LDC New Incentives Report | Página 23

Type Name Description and examples Strengths Challenges � CaneChanger( GBR catchments)
� Informative � Low cost to administer
� Can be used as a stepping off point for engagement and information collection for other more targeted incentive schemes such as grants, subsidies and competitive payments
� Requires landholders to engage voluntarily( so unlikely to attract those that have no history of engagement)
Voluntary conservation covenant( can be linked to financial payments)
Binding contract for land management and outcomes. Contract on title so persists into perpetuity. E. g.:
� State government conservation covenant
� Trust for Nature
� Qld Nature Refuge
� Conservation covenant is on title and applies in perpetuity
� Contract could be linked to financial payments for the upfront signing and ongoing management of the land under covenant. This would be subject to negotiation.
� Could be linked to other organizations such as Trust for Nature to administer the conservation covenant through a revolving fund
� Conservation covenant applied at the state government level( which have geographical restrictions)
� Management agreement is not attached to title so not binding on future owners / managers
� Needs monitoring and compliance assessment to ensure the benefits are maintained
� Voluntary so unlikely to attract all of the target landholders
Voluntary management agreements( can be linked to financial payments)
Non-binding agreement for land management and outcomes. E. g.:
� LDC currently has management agreements
� Introduction to a relationship with LDC / water quality programs
� Could lead to an agreement on title
� Flexibility
� Management agreement is not attached to title so not binding on future owners / managers
� Needs monitoring and compliance assessment to ensure the benefits are maintained
� Voluntary so unlikely to attract all of the target landholders
Industry codes / selfregulation
� Grazing BMP � Smartcane BMP � My BMP( cotton) � ISO 14001
� Reward those at the top end as a form of social recognition
� Could engage landholders who have been difficult to engage with before
� Can use the grazing BMPs as a stepping off point
� Requires third party verification to hold any weight.
� Self-regulation is highly unlikely to achieve adoption at sufficient scale to make a substantive difference
Financia
l
Grants
Direct once-off financial payment usually towards on ground works. Usually involves cost-sharing and a contract. E. g.:
� Over the fence grants( BBB)
� Well known and understood
� Flat rate usually does not reward innovation
Landholders driving change: Exploring new incentives | 21