effect ?"). [ 15 ] Harrington v . Purdue Pharmaceuticals , 603 U . S . 204 , 260 ( 2024 ) ( Kavanaugh , J ., dissenting ). [ 16 ] Transcript of Oral Argument at 41 , Hewitt v . United States , 144 S . Ct . 2713 ( 2024 ). [ 17 ] Id . at 44 . [ 18 ] Id . at 21-22 .
[ 19 ] Id . at 49 ( Assistant to the Solicitor General Masha Hansford noting that there are sixteen offenders with vacated sentences who have already benefited from application of the FSA , as well as eight additional ones for whom this question is open ).
[ 20 ] Id . at 19-20 ( Justice Sotomayor pointing out that a ruling that the FSA applies to defendants with vacated sentences would merely provide judges with greater discretion in resentencing , as they would still have the freedom to craft a sentence higher than the new mandatory minimum created by the Act ).