Lab Matters Fall 2019 | Page 12

FEATURE installments over ten years. And a joint statement from APHL, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), and National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems (NAPHSIS) highlights six areas where this investment is urgently needed: • Enhancing the security and analytical capabilities of the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS), which collects data to inform outbreak response and to create a snapshot of health in the US. All you have to do is read [CDC’s] Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report and you’ll see that there’re lots of reports—robust, scientifically sound, public health reports—but they rely on data from two, three or even five years ago. And that’s not quick enough.” Michael Iademarco, MD, MPH • Expanding and simplifying electronic case reporting (eCR) from clinicians to public health agencies to enable timely interventions to prevent the spread of “notifiable” diseases and conditions— so-called because clinicians are legally required to notify health authorities about these infectious diseases and conditions of public health concern. (About 75 nationally notifiable diseases and conditions are tracked by NNDSS. Additionally, each state maintains its own list of state notifiable diseases and conditions, which may also be reportable to the patient’s local health agency.) • Enhancing syndromic surveillance to provide near real-time data on hospital emergency department visits for ongoing monitoring of community health threats, such as opioid overdoses. • Enabling secure, interoperable, real-time reporting and exchange of electronic vital records system data—i.e., birth outcomes and causes of death—to inform public health activities, such congenital syphilis prevention programs. • Strengthening laboratory information management systems (LIMS), without which laboratories cannot electronically report data to health authorities and healthcare providers. • Developing a public health data science workforce able to maximize the security and utility of public health data, such as the reams of information generated by technologies like whole genome sequencing. 10 LAB MATTERS Fall 2019 “Why can’t that data flow intelligently?” One area that has received much attention of late is eCR. Historically, case reporting has relied on a physician or nurse recognizing a notifiable disease, such as tuberculosis or measles, extracting patient data from paper files, and then filling out a form and faxing, mailing or e-mailing the form to health authorities at the federal, state and/or local levels. At the receiving end, public health personnel had to manually enter the data into their notifiable disease databases and follow up with providers to secure missing information—a tedious process with room for error. Needless to say, many notifiable diseases have been significantly underreported. Today, with 96% of hospitals and 78% of physicians using electronic health records (EHRs) for their patients, Iademarco asked, “Why can’t that data flow intelligently to the health departments that need it to take action?” The federal Digital Bridge initiative aims to jumpstart that electronic data flow, beginning with a handful of core notifiable conditions—chlamydia, gonorrhea, pertussis, Salmonella infection, Zika virus and hepatitis C (an optional add-on)— in seven jurisdictions taking part in a CDC-funded pilot project. Iademarco said, “It’s not just about counting cases, but getting useful information about the cases. ... With interoperable systems, you’re able to focus on data quality.” Shan He, PhD, a senior medical informaticist at Utah’s largest healthcare system, is among those implementing the project at ground level. Her employer, Intermountain Healthcare, operates 24 hospitals and over 160 clinics in Utah, plus a hospital in Idaho. She said, “The goal of eCR compared with electronic laboratory reporting [which conveys laboratory test results] is to provide all that additional clinical information, including symptoms and even some treatment initiated by the providers,” to reduce the burden on public health case investigators and Intermountain staff. PublicHealthLabs @APHL APHL.org