KNOW, the Magazine for Paralegals Fall/Winter 2013.2 | Page 37

things, fail to prepare law students for practice. (University of Chicago Press, 2012) The ABA Task Force on the Future of Legal Education has been charged to study the “key challenges facing the delivery of legal services and the provision of legal education” including the rising cost of legal education, declining employment prospects, practical skills training, and the changing nature of legal work. One of its subcommittees has issued a preliminary call for states to create a common framework for licensing nonlawyers to provide a limited range of legal services and for law schools to provide the requisite educational programs, which the ABA would then accredit. In California, the State Bar Board has adopted the resolution of its Limited Licensing Working Group to “study and develop a proposed limited license to practice law….” And the state of Washington has already adopted a Legal Technician licensing scheme that holds promise to increase access to legal services in high-need specialties like family law. In a series of columns, we will address these emerging issues, give examples of changes we are already seeing, and discuss how this rapidly shifting environment is affecting paralegals. To be sure, we are already seeing new kinds of jobs appear in the legal landscape up every day. As an example, after we decided to write on this topic, the ABA Journal published a list of new and expected jobs, among them: legal risk manager, legal knowledge engineer, expert trusted adviser, consumer financial protection bureau compliance officer, internal investigations lawyer, client teams specialist, and law firm integration coach, wellness expert, and protocol expert. - Therese Cannon, Esq. Something is different now. I got my first job in a law firm in 1983. The senior attorney was an elderly, very distinguished gentleman. He wore a suit and tie to work, even on the weekends. He forbade a couch in the office waiting room because “it didn’t look respectable.” No one would have called him “old school” in a sneering sort of way because he represented what was fine and honorable about the legal profession as it existed up until the end of the last century. He was an honored, extended member of his client families. His opinion was sought on every type of legal need throughout his clients’ lives, whether it was a will, an incorporation, a contract, a divorce. He attended his clients’ funerals before probating their estates. He was that old-fashioned type of counselor that for some reason, although needed more than ever to help us navigate the complexities of modern American life, no longer exists. Perhaps that all went away when the law became an industry rather than a learned profession. I was a paralegal in a mid-sized Fresno law firm when Black Monday hit in 1987. A decade later it was the dot-com bubble. During each of those times, attorney jobs disappeared and attorneys were suddenly competing, as they are now, for paralegal jobs. But the legal pundits are telling us something is different this time, after the Great Recession. Something is permanent about the upheaval that is happening now, perhaps because the financial crisis was coupled this time with an unprecedented explosion in technological capability and ingenuity and creative new ways of delivering legal services. . Look at what is available now – all manner of virtual paralegal firms have sprung up on the Internet, providing assistance to small and large law firms and in-house counsel in many states and in many practice areas. There are specialized companies such as Novus Law that provides virtual document review, contract management and regulatory filings for law firms. Attorneys are bemoaning the invention of a new app called Shake that creates simple contracts on an iPhone. 37