Journal on Policy & Complex Systems Volume 1, Number 2, Fall 2014 | Page 151

��������������������������
������� . Kruskal-Wallis Test Results From Both Scenarios
Table 2
Kruskal-Wallis Test Results From Both Scenarios
No consumer access to inspection scores
0.6 Compliant Restaurants
0.7 Compliant Restaurants
0.8 Compliant Restaurants
0.9 Compliant Restaurants
Kruskal-Wallis ( 3 df )
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Chi-Sq p-value
Sick Consumers
412.12
64.46
353.08
75.29
328.19
56.78
267.31
59.02
164.85
p < 0.001
Sick , At Risk Consumers
205.24
30.7
179.15
37.71
167.28
26.71
139.25
29.77
150.98
p < 0.001
Naïve Consumers
63.62
55.36
123.2
152.89
145.97
100.61
267.24
141.85
169.4
p < 0.001
Inspected Stores
9.58
2.09
9.64
2.02
9.34
2.27
8.72
2
9.81
p = 0.02
Contaminated Stores
45.46
4.78
38.64
4.06
34.43
3.86
28.43
4.14
283.98
p < 0.001
Low Risk Stores
47.87
7.17
50.35
9.34
52.8
8.45
55.35
7.22
43.76
p < 0.001
Moderate Risk Stores
51.62
7.18
49.3
9.35
46.94
8.45
44.35
7.21
41.4
p < 0.001
High Risk Stores
0.51
0.56
0.35
0.48
0.26
0.44
0.3
0.46
13.09
p = 0.004
Full consumer access to inspection scores
0.6 Compliant Restaurants
0.7 Compliant Restaurants
0.8 Compliant Restaurants
0.9 Compliant Restaurants
Kruskal-Wallis ( 3 df )
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Chi-Sq p-value
Sick Consumers
418.91
45.94
385.81
45.82
342.13
47.37
297.92
41.21
209.48
p < 0.001
Sick , At Risk consumers
206.44
24.11
192.64
24.24
175.2
26.12
154.66
21.44
166.73
p < 0.001
Naïve Consumers
51.4
20.73
84.36
28.85
138.4
47.5
212.56
78.22
287.54
p < 0.001
Inspected Stores
10.13
2.09
9.46
2.24
9.02
2.47
8.63
2.07
24.56
p < 0.001
Contaminated Stores
44.66
4.16
38.77
3.91
33.78
4.23
28.75
4.09
278.29
p < 0.001
Low Risk Stores
47.73
7.99
50.86
8.33
54.48
8.42
55.97
8.53
51.62
p < 0.001
Moderate Risk Stores
51.91
7.92
48.76
8.31
45.27
8.52
43.84
8.6
49.39
p < 0.001
High Risk Stores
0.36
0.52
0.38
0.51
0.25
0.46
0.19
0.39
10.6
p = 0.014
�������� . Sick consumers , both scenarios
149