Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-9 | Page 84

K. Nakamura et al. 708 Fig. 2. Patient flowchart. A total of 220 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the study period. Of these, 126 were excluded and 94 included in the study. Forty-seven patients per group were randomly assigned to a control group and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) group, respectively. Sixteen patients in the control group and 21 in the EMS group were finally included in femoral muscle analysis on day 10. DNR: do not attempt resuscitation, CT: computed tomography, ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Outcomes for the subjects in whom final muscle volume was analysed are shown in Table III and Fig. 3. Femoral muscle volume decreased significantly from day 1 to day 10 in both groups (p<0.0001). The mean rate of volume loss was 17.7% (SD 10.8%) (95% confidence interval; 95% CI 11.9–23.5) for controls and 10.4% (SD 10.1%) (95% CI 5.8–15.1) for EMS patients. The EMS group had significantly reduced the rate of muscle volume loss (41.2%) (p = 0.04). Mean Barthel Index at discharge was 29.0 (SD 18.8) (95% CI 12.0–46.0) for controls and 50.4 (SD 31.6) (95% CI 23.9–76.9) for EMS patients. Although total Table II. Basic characteristics of each group for final femoral muscle analysis. Basic characteristics were not significantly different. Severe patients with mean sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score over 8 and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHEII) score over 20 were included in the final analysis. Sedatives and analgesics administered when the first rehabilitation was introduced on day 2 were described with mean value (maximum and minimum) Age, years, mean (SD) Sex (male), n (%) SOFA, mean (SD) APACHEII, mean (SD) Adjunctive treatments Mechanical ventilation, n (%) Renal replacement therapy, n (%) Steroids, days, n (%) Sedatives and analgesics, days, n (%), mean (SD) Propofol, mg/h, n (%), mean (range) Midazolam, mg/h, n (%), mean (range) Fentanyl, μg/h, n (%), mean (range) Dexmedetomidine, μg/h, n (%), mean (range) Vasopressive agents, days, n (%), mean (range) Muscle relaxants, days, n (%) Nutrition on 7 day, mean (SD) Body weight Total calories, kcal/day Total protein, g/day Enteral/total feeding, % Complicating diseases, n (%) Sepsis Heart failure Stroke Cardiopulmonary arrest Post-surgery Respiratory failure Trauma Endocrine or metabolic disorder EMS: electrical muscle stimulation group; SD: standard deviation. www.medicaljournals.se/jrm EMS n  = 21 Control n  = 16 p-value 76.6 (11.0) 14 (66.7) 8.6 (3.7) 22.8 (6.2) 74.6 (13.1) 11 (68.8) 8.7 (2.8) 22.9 (3.9) 0.61 0.89 0.96 0.97 17 (81.0) 8 (38.1) 7 (33.3) 21 (100), 5.5 (2.7) 21 (100), 11.8 (4–20) 1 (4.8), 2.0 (2–2) 15 (71.4), 72.8 (40–100) 8 (38.1), 27.6 (16–32) 19 (90.5), 6.0 (3.0) 0 (0), 0 13 (81.3) 7 (43.8) 5 (31.3) 16 (100), 5.8 (3.3) 13 (81.3), 12.5 (4–18) 1 (6.3), 3.0 (3–3) 12 (75.0), 68.8 (40–100) 7 (43.8), 25.8 (16–32) 13 (86.7), 5.5 (2.1) 1 (6.7), 1 0.98 0.73 0.89 1 54.7 (11.9) 1,258 (334 52.3 (17.6) 63.1 (25.5) 57.0 (10.8) 1,284 (379) 50.8 (16.3) 71.6 (21.8) 0.69 0.87 0.84 0.54 20 (95.2) 13 (61.9) 8 (38.1) 2 (9.5) 5 (23.8) 14 (66.7) 1 (4.8) 7 (33.3) 15 (93.8) 10 (62.5) 4 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 3 (18.8) 9 (56.2) 0 (0) 8 (50.0) 0.84 0.97 0.40 0.77 0.71 0.52 0.28 0.31 0.72 0.19