Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-9 | Page 74
J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 698–704
ORIGINAL REPORT
EFFECT OF ADDING LAY-TUTORS TO A BACK SCHOOL PROGRAMME FOR
PATIENTS WITH SUBACUTE, NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL WITH A TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
Inge GRUNDT LARSEN, MPH 1 , Lisa GREGERSEN OESTERGAARD, PhD 1,2 , Lene M. THOMSEN, MR 3 , Claus VINTHER
NIELSEN, PhD 4 and Berit SCHIØTTZ-CHRISTENSEN, PhD 5
From the 1 Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, 2 The Research Initiative of
Activity Studies and Occupational Therapy, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern
Denmark, Odense, 3 Danish Rheumatism Association, Gentofte, 4 Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public
Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C and 5 Research Department, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Institute of
Regional Health Services Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding a lay-tu-
tor to the educational sessions of a back school pro-
gramme for patients with subacute low back pain.
Methods: Patients with subacute low back pain were
randomized to a 10-week programme comprising 10 h
education and 20 h physical exercise led by a for-
mer patient as lay-tutor, or a programme led by a
physiotherapist. In the intervention group, former
patients served as lay-tutors in the educational ses-
sions, teaching in conjunction with physiotherapists.
In the control group, 2 physiotherapists led the en-
tire educational programme. Disability, back pain,
leg pain and health status were evaluated blindly at
3 and 24 months.
Results: Eighty-seven patients with subacute low
back pain referred for treatment at 6 selected phy-
siotherapy clinics were allocated to either an inter-
vention group (n = 42) or a control group (n = 45).
No statistically significant difference was found bet-
ween the 2 groups. Both groups of patients showed
a statistically significant improvement in health and
pain measurements from the start of the study to the
3- and 24-month follow-up.
Conclusion: No short- or long-term effect was found
of adding a lay-tutor to the educational sessions of
a back school programme for patients with subacu-
te low back pain with regards to functional activity,
back pain, leg pain or general health. The main limi-
tations are that the potential effect of including lay-
tutors in the educational part of a back school pro-
gramme as an intervention in itself has to be tested,
and the programme has to be tested as a complete
protocol. Also, no specific testing has been perfor-
med to confirm the ideal number of sessions in the
programme.
Key words: subacute low back pain; lay-tutor; patient educa-
tion; self-care; self-management.
Accepted Jul 5, 2019; Epub ahead of print Aug 14, 2019
J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 698–704
Correspondence address: Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, Research De-
partment, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, In-
stitute of Regional Health Services Research, University of Southern
Denmark, DK-5500 Middelfart, Denmark. E-mail: Berit.Schiottz-Chris-
[email protected]
LAY ABSTRACT
National and international guidelines recommend group
exercise programmes for patients with specific or non-
specific low back pain. This includes advice and informa-
tion tailored to the patients’ needs and capabilities in
order to help them self-manage their back pain. Eighty-
seven patients with subacute low back pain were al-
located to a 10-week programme comprising 10 h of
education and 20 h of physical exercise. In the interven-
tion group (42 patients), the educational part was led
by a lay-tutor. In the control group (45 patients), the
educational part was led by physiotherapists. Compared
with patients in the educational sessions led by phy-
siotherapists, patients in those led by lay-tutors did not
show more improved health and pain measurements at
3 and 24 months follow-up after the start of the study.
In conclusion, adding a lay-tutor to the educational ses-
sions of a back school programme for subacute low back
pain patients did not change the outcome at short- and
long-term follow-up.
N
ational and international guidelines recommend
group exercise programmes for patients with spe-
cific or non-specific low back pain (1, 2). This includes
the provision of advice and information tailored to the
patients’ needs and capabilities in order to help them
self-manage their back pain (3).
In Denmark, back school programmes (BSP) are
typically offered within the primary healthcare sector.
The programmes include a combination of physical ex-
ercises and education and are usually led by healthcare
professionals. Education, aiming to equip the patients
with adequate knowledge and skills to better manage
their health-related problems, is included in the most
recent programmes (4). By increasing the patients’
knowledge and skills, the educational part of the back
school aims to support a patient’s motivation to change
their health-related behaviour and to strengthen their
ability to self-manage their back pain (5). It has been
proposed that the inclusion of a lay-person as a facili-
tator might increase short- and long-term self-efficacy
and self-management among patients with chronic
conditions (5).
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license. www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
doi: 10.2340/16501977-2584
Journal Compilation © 2019 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information. ISSN 1650-1977