Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-9 | Page 69

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders General Hospital from January 2014 to November 2016. The diagnosis of NMOSD fulfilled the 2015 Wingerchuk criteria (9). The inclusion criteria for this study were: (i) disability as a result of NMOSD (4≤ EDSS score ≤9); (ii) patient receiving 500 mg methylprednisolone intravenously, which was reduced by half every 3 days, followed by a gradual tapering until 40 mg was reached (14–16 days from the acute attack). The exclusion criteria were: (i) acute attack within 14 days; (ii) other conditions that may affect motor function or impaired cognitive functioning; (iii) se- vere concurrent diseases (i.e. cancer, cardiopulmonary diseases or severe psychiatric disorders). The subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups: a rehabilitation group (MDR) and a control group (usual care; UC). A random sequence was created by a computer. Patients in the UC refused or voluntarily ceased rehabilitation treatment (due to dissatisfaction or for economic reasons). Demographic and clinical data, including sex, age, and disease duration, were collected. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital institutional review board and ethics committee. Intervention Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Medical rehabilita- tion is defined as “a set of measures that assist individuals who experience disability to achieve and maintain optimal physical, sensory, intellectual, psychological and social functioning in interaction with their environment” (8). Since clinical manifes- tations of NMO and MS overlap and NMO was thought to be a variant of MS, some rehabilitation therapies in this study were co-opted from treatments used for MS and NMO. For pyramidal function and walking ability, patients were offered physiotherapy. Physiotherapy typically involved at least 30 min of daily exercise. These exercises included active or passive range-of-motion exercises; strengthening exercises; hand function exercises; transfer exercises; balance training aimed at increasing muscle strength, improving balance and gait, decreasing spasticity and improving functional activities of daily living; and 20 min of robot-assisted gait training according to the patient’s needs. In addition, occupational, cognitive, respiratory and/or phoniatric therapy were provided when necessary (10). For sensory function, patients were provided sensory re- education techniques and occupational therapy. For bladder and bowel, patients received physical treatments, including pelvic floor exercises and/or intermittent cleaning and/ or self-catheterization (11, 12), according to their dysfunction. Patients were allowed to rest before becoming fatigued. Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation was performed 5 days/week for 2–4 h/day for 4 weeks. After 4-week inpatient rehabilitation, the patients were guided to continue community or home-based rehabilitation (walking training, wheelchair operation training) for 3 months. Robot-assisted gait training: LokoHelp (Germany) (13) prac- tical design offered therapists economically feasible access to quick and convenient body weight support (BWS), including ergonomically adjustable seating for assistance with manual treatment. This training was performed in the hospital. Usual care. The control group (usual care; UC) did not receive any specific rehabilitation treatment for gait performance and mobility improvement. During the entire study, both groups were authorized, at will, to exercise in non-rehabilitative contexts. 693 Outcome measures NMOSD impairment was evaluated using EDSS and Functional Systems (FS) scores before the treatment and 4 weeks and 3 months after the treatment. EDSS is based on a detailed neuro- logical examination that combines impairment and disability on a 10-step ordinal scale, ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death), and was performed by 2 neurologists who were both certified by Neurostatus for EDSS competency (14, 15). The patients’ FS were described on 8 subscales, including visual (or optic) functions, brain stem functions, pyramidal functions, sensory functions, bowel and bladder functions, cerebellum functions, cerebral (or mental) functions, and walking functions. If the walking distance is < 500 m, the EDSS score depends on walking ability (16). The EDSS scores were evaluated at the start and end of the training period. Statistical analysis The data for the MDR group were compared with the respective results of the parallel UC group. Descriptive statistics (median, minimum and maximum) are given for all variables. Non- parametric testing (Wilcoxon signed-rank) was performed to compare the EDSS and FS scores. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered significant for all statistical analyses. All statistical analyses and graphs were performed using GraphPad PRISM 5 (Graph Pad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). RESULTS Demographic and clinical features A total of 39 patients with NMOSD were assessed for eligibility and randomized into 2 groups: an MDR group (n = 21) and a UC group (n = 18). One patient in the MDR group and one patient in the control group were lost at the 4-week assessment due to relapse. Three patients in the MDR group and 2 patients in the UC group dropped out due to refusal to continue, and these patients did not perform evaluations at 3 months (Fig. 1). The patients’ demographic and clinical cha- racteristics are reported in Table I. In total, 39 patients with NMOSD (29 females, 10 males) were included in the study. A final total of 32 patients completed the study. The median EDSS score at admission was 7.5 (range 6.0–9.0) All patients with NMOSD had lesions in the spinal cord. No statistically significant baseline Table I. Baseline characteristics of people with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders allocated to multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) or usual care Patients’ characteristics MDR n  = 21 Usual care n  = 18 Age, year, mean (SD) Number of women, n (%) Number of relapses Duration, months, mean (SD) 51.5 (14.0) 15 (88) 4.7 28 (22.9) 54.5 (7.8) 14 (93) 5.2 26 (32.5) SD: standard deviation. J Rehabil Med 51, 2019