S. Tarvonen-Schröder et al.
care. Phys Ther 2015; 95: 1628–1637.
27. Goldstein LB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Horner RD. Charlson
Index comorbidity adjustment for ischemic stroke outcome
studies. Stroke 2004; 35: 1941–1945.
28. Reznik ME, Yaghi S, Jayaraman MV, McTaggart RA, Hemen-
dinger M, Mac Grory BC, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale
is an inferior predictor of functional outcome in the era of
acute stroke intervention. Int J Stroke 2018: 13: 806–810.
29. Sakurai H, Sugiura Y, Motoya I, Kawamura T, Okanisi T,
Kanada Y. The Validity of FIM as a predictor of functional in-
dependence of stroke patients: a comparison between the
early and late elderly. J Phys Ther Sci 2012; 24: 321–329.
30. Andrews G, Kemp A, Sunderland M, Von Korff M, Ustun T.
Normative data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment
Schedule 2.0. PloS One 2009; 4: e8343.
31. Üstün TB KN, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring Health and
Disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Sche-
dule (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
Organization; 2010.
32. Lyden PD, Lu M, Levine SR, Brott TG, Broderick J. A mo-
dified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use
in stroke clinical trials: preliminary reliability and validity.
Stroke 2001; 32: 1310–1317.
33. Adams HP, Jr., Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen
BH, Clarke WR, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score
682
www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the
Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST).
Neurology 1999; 53: 126–131.
34. Khatri P, Conaway MR, Johnston KC. Ninety-day outcome
rates of a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with
mild ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012; 43: 560–562.
35. Sucharew H, Khoury J, Moomaw CJ, Alwell K, Kissela BM,
Belagaje S, et al. Profiles of the National Institutes of
Health Stroke Scale items as a predictor of patient out-
come. Stroke 2013; 44: 2182–2187.
36. Hu HY, Chi WC, Chang KH, Yen CF, Escorpizo R, Liao HF, et
al. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment
Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients
with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 856–862.
37. Tarvonen-Schroder S, Laimi K, Kauko T, Saltychev M.
Concepts of capacity and performance in assessment of
functioning amongst stroke survivors: a comparison of the
Functional Independence Measure and the International
Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Re-
habil Med 2015; 47: 662–664.
38. Saltychev M, Tarvonen-Schroder S, Barlund E, Laimi K.
Differences between rehabilitation team, rehabilitants,
and significant others in opinions on functioning of suba-
cute stroke survivors: Turku ICF study. Int J Rehabil Res
2014; 37: 229–235.