Kwakkel G, Investigators E. Presence of finger extension
and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke pre-
dicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional
outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke
2010; 41: 745–750.
21. Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Hernandez ED, Lan-
dinez NS, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Translation and cultural
validation of clinical observational scales – the Fugl-Meyer
assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in Co-
lombian Spanish. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 41: 2317–2323.
22. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind
S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for
evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med
1975; 7: 13–31.
23. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC,
Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting
of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE):
explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:
W163–194.
24. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso
J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating
the methodological quality of studies on measurement
properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res
Methodol 2010; 10: 22.
25. Nordin A, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A. Intra-rater and
inter-rater reliability at the item level of the Action Re-
search Arm Test for patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med
2014; 46: 738–745.
26. Dancer S, Brown AJ, Yanase LR. National Institutes of
Health Stroke Scale reliable and valid in plain English. J
Neurosci Nurs 2009; 41: 2–5.
27. Dancer S, Brown AJ, Yanase LR. National Institutes of
Health Stroke Scale in plain English is reliable for novice
nurse users with minimal training. J Emerg Nurs 2017;
43: 221–227.
659
28. Brott T, Adams HP, Jr., Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG,
Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction:
a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864–870.
29. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ,
van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment
of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604–607.
30. Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evalua-
tion of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic
upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2008;
40: 787–795.
31. Avdic A, Svensson E. Svenssons method (Version 1.1)
Örebro 2010. Interactive software supporting Svenssons
method. [Cited 2018 Nov 26] availible from: http://avdic.
se/svenssonsmetod.html 2015-08-14.
32. Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random
differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med 1994; 13:
2437–2453.
33. Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining asso-
ciation and agreement measures of paired ordinal data.
Stat Med 2012; 31: 3104–3117.
34. Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data
from rating scales and questionnaires. J Rehabil Med
2001; 33: 47–48.
35. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland
C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing
motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther
1993; 73: 447–454.
36. Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK. Estimating the minimal clini-
cally important difference of an upper extremity recovery
measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil
2011; 18 Suppl 1: 599–610.
37. Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa
A, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function
after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical
practice and clinical trials. Stroke 2011; 42: 427–432.
Reliability of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of upper extremity in stroke
J Rehabil Med 51, 2019