Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-8 | Page 29

tional interviewing for improving recovery after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 95: 30–44. 8. Ellis G, Mant J, Langhorne P, Dennis M, Winner S. Stroke liaison workers for stroke patients and carers: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: Cd005066. 9. Salter K, Foley N, Teasell R. Social support interventions and mood status post stroke: a review. Int J Nurs Studies 2010; 47: 616–625. 10. de Man-van Ginkel JM, Gooskens F, Schuurmans MJ, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdottir TB. A systematic review of therapeutic interventions for poststroke depression and the role of nurses. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 3274–3290. 11. Watkins CL, Wathan JV, Leathley MJ, Auton MF, Deans CF, Dickinson HA, et al. The 12-month effects of early mo- tivational interviewing after acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2011; 42: 1956–1961. 12. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Report No. 47. [The coordination reform [Summary in English].] Rett behandling på rett sted til rett tid 2008–2009 [cited 2019 May 15). Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/ dokumenter/report.no.-47-to-the-storting-2008-2009/ id567201/ (in Norwegian). 13. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petti- crew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50: 587–592. 14. Kirkevold M, Bronken BA, Martinsen R, Kvigne K. Promoting psychosocial well-being following a stroke: developing a theoretically and empirically sound complex interven- tion. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2012; 49: 386–397. 15. Kirkevold M, Martinsen R, Bronken BA, Kvigne K. Promoting psychosocial wellbeing following stroke using narratives and guided self-determination: a feasibility study. BMC Psychol 2014; 2: 4. 16. Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 376–381. 17. Polkinghorne D. Narrative knowing and the human sci- ences. Albany: State University of Redfern: NewYork Press, 1988. 18. Zoffmann V, Lauritzen T. Guided self-determination impro- ves life skills with type 1 diabetes and A1C in randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 64: 78–86. 19. Norwegian Directorate of Health. Treatment and reha- bilitation after stroke (clinical guideline) [cited 2019 May 15]. Available from: https://helsedirektoratet.no/ retningslinjer/hjerneslag/seksjon?Tittel=rehabilitering- etter-hjerneslag-10734 (in Norwegian). 20. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864–870. 21. Ryff CD. Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psy- chosom 2014; 83: 10–28. 22. Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and sub- jective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of 565 life. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54: 403–425. 23. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979; 9: 139–145. 24. Malt UF, Mogstad TE, Refnin IB. [Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire.] Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1989; 109: 1391–1394 (in Norwegian). 25. Goldberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. London: NFEN-Nelson; 1991. 26. Watkins CL, Lightbody CE, Sutton CJ, Holcroft L, Jack CI, Dickinson HA, et al. Evaluation of a single-item screening tool for depression after stroke: a cohort study. Clin Re- habil 2007; 21: 846–852. 27. Hilari K, Lamping DL, Smith SC, Northcott S, Lamb A, Marshall J. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Ap- hasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 544–557. 28. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psy- chosom Res 1993; 37: 147–153. 29. Thommessen B, Thoresen G, Bautz-Holter E, Laake K. Screening by nurses for aphasia in stroke - the Ullevaal Aphasia Screening (UAS) test. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21: 110–115. 30. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011; 30: 377–399. 31. Rubin D. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2004. 32. Bragstad LK, Bronken BA, Sveen U, Hjelle EG, Kitzmuller G, Martinsen R, et al. Implementation fidelity in a complex intervention promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19: 59. 33. Wijenberg MLM, van Heugten CM, van Mierlo ML, Visser- Meily JMA, Post MWM. Psychological factors after stroke: are they stable over time? J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 18–25. 34. Aadal L, Pallesen H, Arntzen C, Moe S. Municipal cross- disciplinary rehabilitation following stroke in Denmark and Norway: a qualitative study. Rehabil Res Pract 2018: 1972190. 35. Latkin CA, Edwards C, Davey-Rothwell MA, Tobin KE. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-re- ports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addict Behav 2017; 73: 133–136. 36. Cassidy JM, Cramer SC. Spontaneous and therapeutic- induced mechanisms of functional recovery after stroke. Transl Stroke Res 2017; 8: 33–46. 37. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th edn, new international edn. Harlow: Pearson; 2014. 38. Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 529–536. 39. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and ela- boration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2012; 10: 28–55. Psychosocial well-being after stroke J Rehabil Med 51, 2019