Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-7 | Page 52

521 Aerobic exercise in adult neuromuscular rehabilitation Fig. 2. Perceived barriers to prescribing aerobic exercise in adult neuromuscular rehabilitation. Dark and light bars indicate the number of respondents reporting the item as a barrier to prescribing aerobic exercise in respectively specialized centres and primary care. This concerned a multiple response variable. Need for support Application of aerobic exercise The majority of respondents (77%) reported the need for support to improve the application of AE in neuro- muscular rehabilitation. Most support is needed with respect to the screening procedure (54%) and dosing of exercise (48%), while monitoring and evaluation were reported by, respectively, 33% and 31% of re- spondents. The preferred means of support was via a guideline (71%), followed by the availability of an (online) course (62%) and e-learning (58%). Although this survey indicates that AE is applied wi- dely in adult neuromuscular rehabilitation, healthcare professionals appear to be rather reserved with respect to the training dose they prescribe, and to struggle with determination of the target intensity. Therefore, it is questionable whether AE is applied effectively in current care. The most optimal FITT factors for AE in NMD have not yet been described (13, 14). In the general population (23), and other clinical populations, such as stroke (24), hypertension (25) and type 2 diabetes (26), there is consensus that AE requires the frequent (i.e. 3–5 days weekly) use of large muscle groups, for prolonged periods of time (≥ 20 min per session). Previous studies demonstrating positive effects of AE in various NMD also made use of these characteristics (5–9), and, in this respect, it is interesting to note that a lower frequency is mostly used in clinical practice. An important finding in line with this is that more than half of the respondents reported underuse in their current practice. Substantial underuse was also reported in previous studies by both practitioners (27) and patients (28), even though this concerned general physical therapy treatment in NMD. A study in stroke rehabilitation showed that, despite clear recommenda- tions for moderate- to-vigorous intensity AE, physical therapists commonly prescribed light intensities (19). The authors relate this to safety concerns, which, sup- ported by the perceived barriers in the current study, DISCUSSION This study provides an insight into the current appli- cation of AE in adult neuromuscular rehabilitation in the Netherlands from the perspective of a healthcare professional. All respondents applied AE in various NMD, and programmes generally included sessions of more than 20 min, conducted 2 days per week, over a period of 9–16 weeks, using several different methods to target intensity and exercise modes. De- spite the strong agreement among healthcare profes- sionals that AE should be incorporated into treatment programmes, they experienced several barriers. More than three-quarters of respondents indicated the need for support to improve the application of AE in neuromuscular rehabilitation, preferably through the development of guidelines and education, covering, in particular, the screening procedure and dosing of training programmes. J Rehabil Med 51, 2019