Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-6 | Page 42

436 B. J. H. van Lith et al. Table II. Distribution of botulinum toxin per leg Units/ml   Gracilis Adductor magnus Adductor longus   Percentage thigh length*, % MAS 1 MAS ≥ 2 15 35 60 15 35 15 35 20/1.00 20/1.00 20/1.00 40/2.00 40/2.00 40/2.00 20/1.00 15/0.75 15/0.75 15/0.75 30/1.50 30/0.75 30/1.50 15/0.75 *Upper leg length was calculated from pubis bone to medial femoral condyle. Thigh-length percentages were expressed from pubis. The BTX-A was distributed over the gracilis, adductor magnus and adductor longus muscles according to Table II. Muscle selection was based on muscle volume and its moment arm with respect to the hip joint. Thigh length was measured from the pubic bone to the medial femoral condyle and thigh length percentages were calculated from the pubic bone (see Fig. 1). All BTX-A injections were placed under ultrasound guidance. During the 16-week study period, participants were instructed to perform stretching exercises of the hip adductors (with the hips both flexed and extended) for approximately 10 min, 3 times per day, and to log their exercises in a diary. The exercises were individually demonstrated and instructed by a physio­ therapist at the day of the BTX-A injections until each partici- pant was able to correctly perform the exercises independently. Outcome measures Instrumented gait assessments. For instrumented gait as- sessment, the GAITRite system was used (CIR Systems, Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA), which is a 4.88-m long carpeted walkway that contains pressure sensors that detect the position of each footfall (12). Participants started at one end of the GAITRite and were instructed to walk 3 times across the walkway with (adapted) shoes and/or orthoses at their preferred speed. Sub- sequently, they walked 3 times across the walkway at their maximal speed without risking a fall. For each step, gait width was determined by the GAITRite system (and stored as “stride width”) and exported to Microsoft Excel. For each participant, the median gait width of all steps was calculated to avoid a Fig. 1. Schematic view of injection locations in percentages thigh length from the pubic bone to the medial femoral condyle. At the indicated thigh lengths, botulinum toxin (BTX) was injected into the adductor longus (L), adductor magnus (M) and gracilis (G). www.medicaljournals.se/jrm disproportional influence of a single outlying step. Gait width was determined for both the preferred (primary outcome) and maximal gait speed. In addition, the mean preferred and mean maximal gait speed of the 3 trials was calculated. Instrumented dynamic balance assessments. For instrumented dynamic balance assessments, the Radboud Falls Simulator was used (RFS). The RFS is a moveable platform (240 × 174 cm; BAAT, Enschede, The Netherlands (13)) that can translate in multiple directions. In this way, perturbations can be imposed that mimic natural situations. In this study, only sideways perturbations were used, where a leftward platform translation resulted in a rightward balance perturbation and vice versa. In the remainder of this text, we consistently refer to the direction of the balance perturbations. At the start of each measurement, participants were instructed to sustain all perturbations by making a single lateral step with­ out grabbing the handrails, while the perturbation direction was known to the participants. All participants wore a safety harness attached to the ceiling that prevented them from falling. In addi- tion, a railing system was present at both sides that participants could grab in the case of a fall. At the first measurement (T0), participants were exposed to increasing perturbation intensities that started at 0.125 m/s 2 and were increased by at least 0.125 m/s 2 between trials. The maximum perturbation intensity that each participant could successfully sustain with a single step at least once out of 3 trials (without falling or grabbing the railing system) defined the individual limit of stability. To familiarize them with the test situation, during the subsequent measure- ments (T1 and T2), participants were again exposed to at least 15 incremental perturbation intensities until their individual limits of stability were reached. During all measurements each participant was twice (ran- domly) exposed to 5 leftward and 5 rightward perturbations at their individual limits of stability. During the first 10 perturba- tions, the perturbation direction was known to the participant, whereas during the last 10 trials the perturbation direction was unknown. These 20 trials were used for statistical analysis. During all balance assessments, kinematic data were recor- ded by an 8-camera 3D motion analysis system (Vicon Motion Systems, Oxford, UK) at a sample rate of 100 Hz. Reflective markers were placed at anatomical landmarks according to the full-body PlugInGait configuration (14). For all trials in which the participant succeeded to make a sidestep following the perturbation, the leg angle (primary outcome) was calculated at the instant of stepping-foot contact, as the body configuration at step contact appears to critically determine the successfulness of balance recovery responses (15). The leg angle was defined as the angle between the absolute vertical and a line connecting the mid-pelvis and the ankle marker of the stepping foot. The medians of the 5 right and 5 left leg angles were calculated to av- oid a disproportional influence of a single outlying value. These medians were averaged for each person into a single leg angle score for the perturbations with known and unknown directions separately. Furthermore, the success rates of the lateral stepping responses were calculated for the perturbations with known and unknown directions separately. A trial was scored as successful if the participant maintained balance with a single sidestep. Physical tests. Muscle strength of the hip adductors and hip abductors was assessed with the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (0–5), with lower scores indicating more muscle weakness (16). Muscle tone of the hip adductors was assessed using the MAS (0–5), with higher scores indicating more hy- pertonia (17). Furthermore, passive range of motion (ROM) on