Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-5 | Page 44

M. McGrath et al. impairments offers new insights into their needs. The range of content include by participants represents a broad understanding of sexuality. There was a high level of consensus on content areas that were important to respondents. In a subsequent pilot randomized con- trolled trial, the intervention will be evaluated with regard to feasibility of implementation, acceptability of the developed intervention, retention of stroke sur- vivors and their partners, and compliance. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the Stroke Foundation Australia through a Small Project Research Grant (SPG1713). REFERENCES 1. McGrath M, Lever S, McCluskey A, Power E. How is sexuality after stroke experienced by stroke survivors and partners of stroke survivors? A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 293–303. 2. Stroke Foundation.Clinical guidelines for stroke manage- ment 2017. Melbourne (Australia): Stroke Foundation; 2017. 3. Royal College of Physicians Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016. 4. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016; 47: e98–e169. 5. Stein J, Hillinger M, Clancy C, Bishop L. Sexuality after stroke: patient counseling preferences. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 1842–1847. 6. Park JH, Ovbiagele B, Feng W. Stroke and sexual dysfun- ction – a narrative review. J Neurol Sci 2015; 15: 7–13. 7. Rosenbaum T, Vadas D, Kalichman L. Sexual function in post-stroke patients: considerations for rehabilitation. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 15–21. 8. Sjögren K. Sexuality after stroke with hemiplegia. II. With special regard to partnership adjustment and to fulfilment. Scand J Rehabil Med 1983; 15: 63–69. 9. Kim JH. Relationship among sexual knowledge, frequency, satisfaction, marital intimacy and levels of depression in stroke survivors and their spouses. J Korean Acad Nurs 2008; 38: 483–491. 10. Korpelainen JT, Nieminen P, Myllylä AA. Sexual functioning among stroke patients and their spouses. Stroke 1999; 30: 715–719. 11. McLaughlin J, Cregan A. Sexuality in stroke care: a neg- lected quality of life issue in stroke rehabilitation? Sex Disabil 2005; 23: 213–226. 12. Kang HS, Kim HK, Park SM, Kim JH. Online-based inter- ventions for sexual health among individuals with cancer: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18: 167. 13. Chung E, Brock G. Sexual rehabilitation and cancer sur- vivorship: a state of art review of current literature and management strategies in male sexual dysfunction among prostate cancer survivors. J Sex Med 2013; 10 Suppl 1: 360 www.medicaljournals.se/jrm 102–211. 14. Klein R, Bar-on E, Klein J, Benbenishty R. The impact of sexual therapy on patients after cardiac events participa- ting in a cardiac rehabilitation program. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14: 672–678. 15. Courtois FJ, Mathieu C, Charvier KF, Leduc B, Bélanger M. Sexual rehabilitation for men with spinal cord injury: preliminary report on a behavioral strategy.Sex Disabil 2001; 19: 149–157. 16. Song H, Oh H, Kim H, Seo W. Effects of a sexual rehabi- litation intervention program on stroke patients and their spouses. NeuroRehabilitation 2011; 28: 143–150. 17. Ng L, Sansom J, Zhang N, Amatya B, Khan F. Effectiveness of a structured sexual rehabilitation programme following stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2017; 49: 333–340. 18. Sansom J, Ng L, Zhang N, Khan F, Couldrick L. Lets talk about sex: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a struc- tured sexual, rehabilitation programme in an Australian stroke cohort. Int J Ther Rehabil 2015; 22: 21–29. 19. Jŭnger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 2017; 31: 684–706. 20. Murray JW, Hammons JO. Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Rev High Ed 1995; 18: 423–436. 21. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 376–380. 22. Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41: 376–382. 23. Graham ID, Kothari A, McCutcheon C. Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation. Implement Sci 2018; 13: 22. 24. Rose TA, Worrall LE, Hickson LM, Hoffmann TC. Guiding principles for printed education materials: design prefe- rences of people with aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2012; 14: 11–23. 25. Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan FJ, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Sup- ported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 624–638. 26. Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, Duckett S, Skeat J, Dodd K, et al. Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16: 285–291. 27. Aphasia Insititute. Intimacy and relationships: talking to your doctor. Ontario, Canada: Aphasia Institute; 2015. 28. Burnette DN, Morrow-Howell N, Chen LM. Setting priorities for gerontological social work research: a national Delphi study. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 828–838. 29. Owens C, Farrand P, Darvill R, Emmens T, Hewis E, Ait- ken P. Involving service users in intervention design: a participatory approach to developing a text-messaging intervention to reduce repetition of self-harm. Health Expect 2011; 14: 285–295. 30. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Med- ical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015; 350: h1258. 31. Brady MC, Fredrick A, Williams B. People with aphasia: capacity to consent, research participation and interven- tion inequalities. Int J Stroke 2013; 8: 193–196. 32. Kneebone II. Stepped psychological care after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38: 1836–1843.