Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-4inkOmslag | Page 72

A. van Ommeren et al.
Pertti E. Muscle strength as a predictor of onset of ADL
dependence in people aged 75 years. Aging Clin Exper
Res 2002; 14: 10–15.
21. Giampaoli S, Ferrucci L, Cecchi F, Lo Noce C, Poce A, Dima
F, et al. Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in
non-disabled older men. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 283–288
22. Fess EE. Grip strength. 2nd edition. Chicago: Am Soc
Hand Ther 1992.
23. Wu G, Van der Helm FC, Veeger HD, Makhsous M, Van Roy
P, Anglin C, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of
joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting
of human joint motion—part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and
hand. J Biomechanics 2005; 38: 981–992.
24. Murphy MA, Willén C, Sunnerhagen KS. Movement ki-
nematics during a drinking task are associated with the
activity capacity level after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural
Repair 2012; 26: 1106–1115.
25. Nijenhuis SM, Prange GB, Stienen AHA, Buurke JH, Riet-
man JS. Direct effect of a dynamic wrist and hand ortho-
sis on reach and grasp kinematics in chronic stroke. In:
Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2015 IEEE International
Conference on 2015; Singapore: IEEE; 2015, p. 404–409.
26. Murphy MA, Willén C, Sunnerhagen KS. Kinematic variab-
les quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke
during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabil
Neural Repair 2011; 25: 71–80.
27. De Jong SL, Birkenmeier RL, Lang CE. Person-specific
changes in motor performance accompany upper extremity
functional gains after stroke. J Appl Biomechan 2012;
28: 304–316.
28. Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer
DJ. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation
306
www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 702–707.
29. Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when
and how? J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 343–349.
30. Sallinen J, Stenholm S, Rantanen T, Heliövaara M, Sainio
P, Koskinen S. Hand-grip strength cut points to screen
older persons at risk for mobility limitation. J Am Geriatr
Soc 2010; 58: 1721–1726.
31. Cappello L, Meyer JT, Galloway KC, Peisner JD, Granberry
R, Wagner DA, et al. Assisting hand function after spinal
cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove. J Neu-
roeng Rehabil 2018; 15: 59.
32. Polygerinos P, Galloway KC, Savage E, Herman M,
O’Donnell K, Walsh CJ. Soft robotic glove for hand re-
habilitation and task specific training. In: Robotics and
automation (ICRA), 2015 IEEE International Conference
on 2015. Seattle: IEEE; 2015.
33. De Souza R, El-Khoury S, Santos-Victor J, Billard A. Re-
cognizing the grasp intention from human demonstration.
Robot Auton Syst 2015; 74: 108–121.
34. Ekvall S, Kragic D. Grasp recognition for programming by
demonstration. In: Robotics and Automation, Proceedings
of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on 2005. Bar-
celona: IEEE; 2005.
35. Naish KR, Reader AT, Houston-Price C, Bremner AJ, Holmes
NP. To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of
reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action
goal, but observers do not detect these differences. Exp
Brain Res 2013; 225: 261–275.
36. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Soper NJ, Damiano RJ, Klingensmith
ME. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for
basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 702–707.