Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-1CompleteIssue | Page 34

Spatial neglect and cognitive impairment
We are also grateful to our laboratory members and
Ms Mai Kawamura for their helpful advice on drafts
of this manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N
Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1677–1684.
2. Cho KH, Lee JY, Lee KJ, Kang EK. Factors related to gait
function in post-stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;
26: 1941–1944.
3. Kyung Kim, Young Mi Kim, Eun Kyung Kim. Correlation
between the activities of daily living of stroke patients in
a community setting and their quality of life. J Phys Ther
Sci 2014; 26: 417–419.
4. Vincent C, Desrosiers J, Landreville P, Demers L; BRAD
group. Burden of caregivers of people with stroke: evolu-
tion and predictors. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27: 456–464.
5. Brauer SG, Bew PG, Kuys SS, Lynch MR, Morrison G. Pre-
diction of discharge destination after stroke using the motor
assessment scale on admission: a prospective, multisite
study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1061–1065.
6. Chiu HT, Wang YH, Jeng JS, Chen BB, Pan SL. Effect of
functional status on survival in patients with stroke: is
independent ambulation a key determinant? Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 527–531.
7. Di Monaco M, Schintu S, Dotta M, Barba S, Tappero R,
Gindri P. Severity of unilateral spatial neglect is an inde-
pendent predictor of functional outcome after acute in-
patient rehabilitation in individuals with right hemispheric
stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1250–1256.
8. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Pizzamiglio L. The role
of unilateral spatial neglect in rehabilitation of right brain-
damaged ischemic stroke patients: a matched comparison.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 743–749.
9. Paolucci S, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Fusco FR,
Morelli D, et al. Quantification of the probability of reaching
mobility independence at discharge from a rehabilitation
hospital in nonwalking early ischemic stroke patients: a
multivariate study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26: 16–22.
10. Nijboer T, van de Port I, Schepers V, Post M, Visser-Meily
A. Predicting functional outcome after stroke: the influ-
ence of neglect on basic activities in daily living. Front
Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013. 00182.
11. Chen P, Hreha K, Kong Y, Barrett AM. Impact of spatial
neglect on stroke rehabilitation: evidence from the set-
ting of an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 2015; 96: 1458–1466.
12. van Nes IJ, van Kessel ME, Schils F, Fasotti L, Geurts AC,
Kwakkel G. Is visuospatial hemineglect longitudinally as-
sociated with postural imbalance in the postacute phase
of stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 819–824.
13. Durcan S, Flavin E, Horgan F. Factors associated with
community ambulation in chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil
2016; 38: 245–249.
14. Ferreira MS, Chamlian TR, França CN, Massaro AR. Non-
motor factors associated with the attainment of community
ambulation after stroke. Clin Med Res 2015; 13: 58–64.
15. Park J, Lee SU, Jung SH. Prediction of post-stroke fun-
ctional mobility from the initial assessment of cognitive
function. NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 41: 169–177.
16. Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor
recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained atten-
tion: a 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology 1997;
11: 290–295.
17. Lee BH, Kim EJ, Ku BD, Choi KM, Seo SW, Kim GM, et al.
Cognitive impairments in patients with hemispatial neglect
from acute right hemisphere stroke. Cogn Behav Neurol
2008; 21: 73–76.
18. Linden T, Samuelsson H, Skoog I, Blomstrand C. Visual
neglect and cognitive impairment in elderly patients late
after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 111: 163–168.
31
19. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Exami-
nation: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;
40: 922–935.
20. Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleisig Y, Zeilig G, Ohry A,
Adunsky A. Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM
instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy
Cognitive Assessment: relation to functional outcome
of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83:
342–345.
21. Patel MD, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Cognitive im-
pairment after stroke: clinical determinants and its as-
sociations with long-term stroke outcomes. J Am Geriatr
Soc 2002; 50: 700–706.
22. Bour A, Rasquin S, Boreas A, Limburg M, Verhey F. How
predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after
stroke? J Neurol 2010; 257: 630–637.
23. Burton L, Tyson SF. Screening for cognitive impairment
after stroke: a systematic review of psychometric proper-
ties and clinical utility. J Rehabil Med 2015; 47: 193–203.
24. Liu M, Chino N, Tuji T, Masakado Y, Hase K, Kimura A. Psy-
chometric properties of the Stroke Impairment Assessment
Set (SIAS). Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 339–351.
25. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliabi-
lity of the functional independence measure: a quantitative
review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226–1232.
26. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S. The relation
between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1357–1363.
27. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new
method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitu-
dinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis
1987; 40: 373–383.
28. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia:
based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther 1966;
46: 357–375.
29. Miyai I, Sonoda S, Nagai S, Takayama Y, Inoue Y, Kakehi
A, et al. Results of new policies for inpatient rehabilita-
tion coverage in japan. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;
25: 540–447.
30. Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO,
Olsen TS. Hemineglect in acute stroke – incidence and
prognostic implications. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 122–127.
31. Ringman JM, Saver JL, Woolson RF, Clarke WR, Adams HP.
Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral
neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology 2004; 63:
468–474.
32. Nijboer TC, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G. Time course of visu-
ospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort
study. Cortex 2013; 49: 2021–2027.
33. Cassidy TP, Lewis S, Gray CS. Recovery from visuospatial
neglect in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
1998; 64: 555–557.
34. Cumming TB, Plummer-D’Amato P, Linden T, Bernhardt
J. Hemispatial neglect and rehabilitation in acute stroke.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1931–1936.
35. Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kwasnica CM, Harvey RL, Zhang
M. Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere
stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 2001; 82: 322–328.
36. Tromp E, Dinkla A, Mulder T. Walking through doorways:
an analysis of navigation skills in patients with neglect.
Neuropsychol Rehabil 1995; 5: 319–331.
37. Tham K, Borell L, Gustavsson A. The discovery of disabi-
lity: a phenomenological study of unilateral neglect. Am
J Occup Ther 2000; 54: 398–406.
38. Spaccavento S, Cellamare F, Falcone R, Loverre A, Nardulli
R. Effect of subtypes of neglect on functional outcome in
stroke patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 60: 376–381.
39. Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Seiger A, Nydevik I. Neglect and
anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and rela-
tionship to disability. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 215–220.
40. Caeiro L, Ferro JM, Costa J. Apathy secondary to stroke:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis
2013; 35: 23–39.
J Rehabil Med 51, 2019