Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-11 | Page 48
862
L. V. Festvåg et al.
a worldwide total of only 396 new polio cases in the
period 2014–17 (6). In 2019, Afghanistan and Pakistan
are the only 2 endemic countries in which wild polio vi-
rus (WPV) transmission continues to be reported, with
34 cases, while 104 vaccine-derived cases (cVDPV)
occurred in Nigeria and in non-endemic countries (6).
Political conflicts and instability, combined with poor
infrastructure and scepticism about Western health
authorities and vaccines in some regions, continue to
pose challenges to the eradication of the disease (3, 7).
Disability as a result of polio still has profound social
and economic consequences regarding employment,
social class, income and marital status in developing
countries (8, 9). The largest and youngest populations
of people with polio today, approximately 4–5 mil-
lion persons, live in non-industrialized developing
countries, and many are children or of prime working
age. Furthermore, polio occurs disproportionately
amongst the poorest and most marginalized popula-
tions, especially girls. They are the least likely to have
received vaccines and often lack access to medical and
rehabilitation programmes, job training, employment
and social support (10).
Persons with poliomyelitis from developing countries
face multiple challenges when being referred to medical
treatment in Western countries. Non-Western immigrants
often have a complex psychosocial background, with
little or inadequate treatment in the acute and rehabilita-
tion phase (11). Qualitative studies in immigrant polio
patients illustrate challenges associated with physical
capacity, occupational performance, and strategies to
gain respect and take an active part in a new and foreign
society (12–14).
The main aim of this study was to identify the specific
challenges, regarding physical, mental and social fun-
ctioning, for non-Western immigrants to Norway with
previous polio. The findings were compared with similar
functions in Western immigrants with polio, and with
the findings of a previous study including native Norwe-
gian polio survivors (15). The results should therefore
elucidate the specific needs of immigrant polio patients.
and who had acquired their acute poliomyelitis in that country
(a total of 66 persons) were selected. This immigrant group
was divided into 2: immigrants from non-Western developing
countries (34 persons) and Western immigrants from developed
countries (32 persons).
The non-Western immigrant group comprised 11 men and 20
women; 3 persons did not answer the question regarding sex. They
were all born in developing countries where poliomyelitis was
endemic until the 1980s. The Western immigrant study group
comprised 11 men and 21 women, from 14 countries in Europe,
plus 5 from the USA (Table I). Two Western immigrants did not
state their country of origin. No information was available on
age at immigration to Norway.
The reference group, or native Norwegian polio group, in-
cluded 1,342 persons.
Measurements
The questionnaire included 87 items, covering a wide range of
demographic, medical and psychosocial factors and data from
the acute, rehabilitation and late phase of polio. The questionn-
aire was designed by the Norwegian Society of Polio Survivors
in collaboration with researchers, and based on earlier surveys
(16, 17).The following assessments were included:
Quality of life. Two questions from the quality of life scale
LISAT-11 (18) were included, asking how the respondents
perceived their physical and psychological health on a 7-point
scale, ranging from “very unsatisfactory” to “very satisfactory”,
including the category “not relevant”.
Concomitant disease. A questionnaire containing 19 dicho-
tomized questions (yes/no) regarding concomitant diseases
was derived from a large-scale Norwegian population study
(19), and the results were compared with a study on immigrant
health in Norway (20).
Table I. Continent and country of origin for non-Western and
Western immigrant participants
Non-Western immigrants with
polio (n = 34)
Continent of
origin
South America Mexico
Peru
Chile
Africa
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Uganda
METHODS
This study is based on a questionnaire that was distributed in
January 2014 to all registered members of the Norwegian As-
sociation of Polio Survivors (LFPS) (n = 1,998). One reminder
was forwarded by post to non-responders. The response rate was
72%. The same questionnaire was sent to non-LFPS members
with a polio diagnosis, who were registered by the South-Eastern
Norway Health Authority 2010–14 (n = 152). These subjects
were also reminded once (15). A web-link was set up (www.
tns-gallup.no/polio2014) and the survey was advertised on
social media, resulting in 23 additional responders.
From the 1,408 persons who completed and returned the ques-
tionnaire, those who stated that they were born outside Norway
www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
Country of
origin
Asia
Middle East
Burundi
Madagascar
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gambia
India
Iran
Cambodia
Korea
Afghanistan
Vietnam
Myanmar
Syria
Tunisia
Morocco
Iraq
Lebanon
Western immigrants with polio
(n = 32)
Continent
n of origin Country of origin n
1 USA
1 Europe
1
1
1
1 Germany
England
Denmark
Sweden
Switzerland 5
2
2
5
6
1
Austria
Island
Kosovo
Belgium
Bosnia
Scotland
Netherlands
Unknown foreign country 1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
1
5
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1