Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-10 | Page 58

D. L. Snell et al.
following total knee replacement surgery. Arthrit Care Res
2011: 286–292.
3. Westby MD. Rehabilitation and total joint arthroplasty. Clin
Geriatr Med 2012; 28(3): 489–508.
4. Hooper G, Alex A, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Current trends
and projections in the utilisation rates of hip and knee
replacement in New Zealand from 2001 to 2026. NZ Med
J 2014; 127: 1401.
5. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association (NZOA). New Zealand
Joint Registry: seventeen year report (January 1999 to
December 2015). Christchurch, New Zealand, 2016.
6. Bischoff-Ferrari H, Lingard E, Losina E, Baron J, Roos E,
Phillips C, et al. Psychosocial and geriatric correlates of
functional status after total hip replacement. Arthritis
Rheumat Arthritis Care Res 2004; 51: 829–835.
7. Judge A, Welton N, Sandhu J, Ben-Shlomo Y. Equity in
access to total joint replacement of the hip and knee in
England: cross sectional study. BMJ 2010; 341: c4092.
8. Mújica Mota R, Tarricone R, Ciani O, Bridges J, Drum-
mond M. Determinants of demand for total hip and knee
arthroplasty: a systematic literature review. BMC Health
Services Res 2012; 12: 225–243.
9. Sheridan N, Kenealy T, Connolly M, Mahony F, Barber A, Boyd
M, et al. Health equity in the New Zealand health care sys-
tem: a national survey. Int J Equity Health 2011; 10: 45–59.
10. Harcombe H, Davie G, Derrett S, Abbott H, Gwynne-Jones
D. Equity of publicly-funded hip and knee joint replacement
surgery in New Zealand: results from a national observa-
tional study. NZ Med J 2016; 129: 8–18.
11. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the per-
ceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone
Joint Surg 1996; 78B: 185–190.
12. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on
the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80: 863–869.
13. Dripps R. New classification of physical status. Anesthe-
siology 1963; 24: 111.
778
www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
14. Skevington S, Lofty M, O’Connell K. The World Health
Organization’s WHOQOL-Bref quality of life assessment:
psychometric properties and results of the international
field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res
2004; 13: 299–310.
15. Snell D, Siegert R, Hooper G, Dunn J, Surgenor L. Evalua-
ting quality of life outcomes following joint replacement:
validation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref. Qual Life
Res 2016; 25: 51–61.
16. Beard D, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray D, Carr A,
et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee
scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol
2015; 68 : 73–79.
17. Waldrop D, Lightsey O, Ethington C, Woemmel C, Coke A.
Self-efficacy, optimism, health competence and recovery
from orthopaedic surgery. J Counsell Psychol 2001; 48:
233–238.
18. Tristaino V, Lantieri F, Tornago S, Gramazio M, Carriere E,
Camera A. Effectiveness of psychological support in pa-
tients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty:
a controlled cohort study. J Orthop Traumatol 2016; 17:
137–147.
19. Statistics New Zealand. 2013 Census: New Zealand Go-
vernment; 2013. [Accessed 2019 Apr 18] Available from:
http://m.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census.aspx.
20. Singleton N, Buddicom E, Vane A, Poutawera V. Are there
differences between Maori and non-Maori patients under-
going primary total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery in
New Zealand? A registry-based cohort study. NZ Med J
2013; 126: 23–30.
21. Durie M. Understanding health and illness: research at the
interface between science and indigenous knowledge. Int
J Epidemiol 2004; 33: 1138–1143.
22. Selak V, Crengle S, Elley C, Wadham A, Harwood M, Rafter
N, et al. Recruiting equal numbers of indigenous and non-
indigenous participants to a ‘polypill’ randomized trial. Int
J Equity Health 2013; 12: 44–50.