Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-10 | Page 28

G. Gard et al.
16. Morgan D. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd edn.
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1997.
17. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for re-
porting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist
for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care
2007; 19: 349–357.
18. WMA: World medical Association Declaration of Helsinki:
ethical principles for medical research involving human
subjects. JAMA 2013; 10: 2191–2194.
19. Vestling M, Ramel E, Iwarsson S. Thoughts and expe-
riences from returning to work after stroke. Work 2013;
45: 201–211.
20. Öst Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Johansson U, Hellman T. Expe-
riences of the return to work process after stroke while par-
ticipating in a person-centred rehabilitation programme.
Scand J Occup Ther 2017; 24: 349–356.
21. Donker-Cools B, Schouten MJE, Wind H, Frings-Dresen
MHW. Return to work following acquired brain injury: the
views of patients and employers. Disabil Rehabil 2018;
40: 185–191.
22. Hudon C, Fortin M, Haggerty J, Loignon C, Lambert M,
Poitras ME. Patient-centered care in chronic disease ma-
nagement: a thematic analysis of the literature in family
medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 88: 170–176.
23. Burns SP, Schwartz JK, Scott SL, Devos H, Kovic M, Hong
I, et al. Interdisciplinary approaches to facilitate return to
driving and return to work in mild stroke: a position paper.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 2378–2388.
748
www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
24. Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R. Survey of survivors’ perspective
on return to work after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2015;
22: 326–334.
25. Theadom A, Rutherford S, Kent B, McPherson K, ARCOS
IV Group. The process of adjustment over time following
stroke: a longitudinal qualitative study. Neuropsychol
Rehabil 2019; 29: 1464–1474.
26. Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Developing stroke–
specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis
of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36:
409–417.
27. Inspektionen för socialförsäkringen. [Changes in go-
vernance in Försäkringskassan: Analysis of how the
Goverment influence the handling of sickness benefit.]
Stockholm: Inspektionen för socialförsäkringen (ISF);
2018. ISF-rapport 2018: 16 (in Swedish).
28. Calner T, Nordin C, Eriksson MK, Nyberg L, Gard G, Mi-
chaelson P. Effects of a self-guided, web-based activity
programme for patients with persistent musculoskeletal
pain in primary healthcare: a randomized controlled trial.
Eur J Pain 2017; 21: 1110–1120.
29. Lexell EM, Lexell J, Larsson-Lund M. The rehabilitation plan
can support clients’ active engagement and facilitate the
process of change – experiences from people with late ef-
fects of polio participating in a rehabilitation programme.
Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38: 329–336.
30. Öhman A. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation re-
search. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 273–280.