Journal of Academic Development and Education JADE Issue 10 | Page 104
HIGHLIGHT #2 | 104
HIGHLIGHT #2
Title
Lecture Highlights:
Repurposing Lecture Capture
to Provide Learning Resources
for Level 6 Chemistry Students
Authors
Laura M. Hancock, Graeme R.
Jones, & Daniela Plana
DOI
http://doi.org/10.21252/
KEELE-0000035
Contact
[email protected]
The term “lecture capture
technology” has been used in
the literature to encompass a
range of different technologies,
ranging from pre-recording
lectures
in
a
separate
environment to the recording
of live lectures and their later
distribution to students.[1-4]
Currently, the system at Keele,
PlayBack, allows the audio and
the screen of a live lecture to
be recorded a later released to
students.[5] Lecture capture is
a particularly inclusive tool, as
it not only especially supports
students who have genuine
reasons for missing sessions
(illness, caring responsibilities,
work), but also students
learning in a language that is
not their own.[1, 6] The ability
to re-live a lecture, to pause it
and go at their own speed, is
incredibly helpful for learners
that are not studying in their
native tongue. For many of the
same factors, it is also helpful
for students with particular
learning disabilities.[1]
Lecture capture generates an
extensive collection of learning
resources, which can be used
to support learning in various
ways. However, although it has
become commonplace, there
are fewer examples of lecture
recordings being edited to
create shorter clips.[7] Here
we report initial findings into
the generation of “Lecture
Highlights”, learning resources
created from editing lecture
capture recordings by student
editors, we also comment on
the features that we included
and how these were received
and used by two related
cohorts of students.
Implementation
The choice of topics for
production
of
Lecture
Highlights,
was
mainly
based on the fact that in the
2017/2018
academic
year,
the first cohort of students
from a 3+1 joint degree with
Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
joined the 3rd year chemistry
students at Keele for the first
time. As the two cohorts have
not had the same prior learning
experiences, we are dealing
with a very diverse cohort in
many ways. Providing these
resources takes advantage of
the benefits of lecture capture
for diverse student cohorts,
allowing students to access
the material multiple times,
independent of time and
location, at a speed that suits
them.
Through the support of a
Keele Teaching Innovation
Project the Lecture Highlights
were created. These consisted
of short, interactive resources,
created
from
previously
recorded
lecture
content,
along with accompanying
slides for note-taking. All
resources have a clear title,
along with a concise one
sentence summary of the
key concept discussed, and
a final slide with a handful of
bullet points answering the
statement “you should now
be able to…”. One additional
important feature is that
these Lecture Highlights were
fully
captioned
(subtitled
in English). They are not
necessarily of the polished
quality
of
a
standalone
screencast,
but
require
HIGHLIGHT #2 | 105
LECTURE HIGHLIGHTS: REPURPOSING LECTURE CAPTURE
TO PROVIDE LEARNING RESOURCES FOR LEVEL 6 CHEMISTRY STUDENTS
significantly less time and effort to produce.
The Lecture Highlights were produced by students who had
previously taken the modules from which the lectures were taken.
Some direction was provided by staff, such as guidance on the
software to be used (Camtasia), the length of videos to be produced
(5-10 min), the need for captioning and accompanying edited lecture
notes to be provided. The students were mainly allowed complete
freedom over the videos, which produced some interesting results,
such as the introduction of the final “you should now be able to…”
slide.
Lecture Highlights were provided to Level 6 Keele Chemistry
students in various Semester 1 modules of the 2017–2018 academic
year. The topics on which they were produced and made available
were selected by asking colleagues what they wanted/thought
was relevant for the cohort. They were then provided to the staff
member, or put directly on the appropriate module virtual learning
environment, and it was left to them to make the resources available
to the students or signpost them.
Methodology
Level 6 chemistry students were asked to complete paper
questionnaires anonymously and voluntarily; these were available to
the students over a series of timetabled laboratory sessions towards
the end of the 2017/2018 academic year. A little over a third of the
cohort (26 students, 36%) completed the questionnaires; within that
the students on the 3+1 joint-degree programme were somewhat
over represented (42% as opposed to 27%), and thus results are
considered both on average across the full Keele Chemistry cohort
and per individual cohort (labelled throughout as “Joint cohort”, for
students on the 3+1 degree, and “Keele cohort”, for students who
have studied at Keele throughout their degree). Students were
informed that data collected could be used for publication. Ethical
approval was obtained through the LPDC Student Project Ethics
Committee.
Evaluation
The first observation from the questionnaires was that approximately
a third of those that answered reported having no knowledge of the
availability of Lecture Highlights as learning resources; and even
those that did were not necessarily aware of the breath of resources
available (individual topics were known by a range varying from 36
to 62% of the students).