Jewish Life Digital Edition June 2015 | Page 18

the work they were doing.” As Anchor emphasises, “The mental construction of our daily activities, more than the activity itself, defines our reality.” Anchor describes another experiment in which researchers administered IQ tests to students. “The researchers then told the teachers in each of the classrooms which students – say, Sam, Sally, and Sarah – the data had identified as academic superstars, the ones with the greatest potential for growth. They asked the teachers not to mention the results of the study to the students, and not to spend any more or less time with them. (And, in fact, the teachers were warned they would be observed to make sure they did not.) At the end of the year, the students were tested again, and indeed, Sam, Sally, and Sarah posted off-the-chart intellectual ability. This would be a predictable story, except for an ‘O Henry-type twist’ at the end. When Sam, Sally, and Sarah had been tested at the beginning of the experiment, they were found to be absolutely, wonderfully ordinary. The researchers had randomly picked their names and then lied to the teachers about their ability. But after the experiment, they had in fact turned into academic superstars. So, what caused these ordinary students to become extraordinary? Although the teachers had said nothing directly to these children and had spent equal amounts of time with everyone, two crucial things had happened. The belief the teachers had in the students’ potential had been unwittingly and nonverbally communicated. More importantly, these non-verbal messages were then digested by the students and transformed into reality” – a profound lesson for every parent and teacher. In another study, a group of Asian women were given maths tests of equal difficulty at two different times. Before the first test, “they were primed to think about the fact that they were women, stereotypically worse at maths than men”. Before the second test, “they were told to focus on their identity as Asians, generally thought to be maths whizzes compared to other ethnic groups”. The result: the women performed far better in the second situation than they did in the first. Their IQs didn’t change between tests. The only difference was that in the second 14 JEWISH LIFE n ISSUE 85 It didn’t take a cash reward or the promise of a promotion or an extra week of vacation to boost their moods enough to make them twice as effective and more than twice as creative… even the smallest shots of positivity can give someone a serious competitive edge. test, “they believed more in their ability, and this was enough to make a substantive difference in performance”. Achor presents a fascinating real life example of this phenomenon. Racial stereotypes have been determined to be a factor in the achievement gap that exists between black and white students in the USA. For example, when students are required to complete a form on which they disclose their race prior to taking a standardised test, black students perform worse than white student on such tests. Researchers wondered if, when Barak Obama was elected president of the United States, this would have an impact on this achievement gap, so they gave a 20-question standardised test to more than 400 Americans just before and just after the 2008 presidential election. On the first test, black students scored worse overall than white students – but, on the second test, their performance improved so significantly that they managed to entirely erase the gap! Achor comments that the election of Obama “erased the self-doubt that had hindered black performance. While this was only one study and its effects were probably temporary, it illustrates how strongly our beliefs can affect our abilities.” Make no mistake; it’s not just words that can put us in a more productive mood; it’s environment as well. As profiled on numerous sitcoms, probably most famously by the character Kramer on Seinfeld, medical schools train doctors to make diagnoses by having them examine people pretending to be patients or review the cases of hypothetical ‘paper’ patients. The point of such exercises is to