Jewellery Focus June 2018 | Page 3

EDITOR’S LETTER CONTRIBUTORS Clarity at last CONTRIBUTORS JOHN LANGFORD John is the director of Braybrook and Britten, a mail order jewellers and silversmiths and has been involved in the business for 20 years KATHERINE ALEXANDRA BRUNACCI A jewellery designer and gemologist who launched her first collection in 2010 shortly after completing her Master of Fine Arts degree at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. JANET FITCH Janet is a veteran JF columnist, and has written for both magazines and newspapers including the Sun and the Daily Mail, later owning her own jewellery shops LEONARD ZELL Leonard has been training fine jewellers for 25 years. His monthly column gives some top tips on sales training and improving your bottom line ON THE COVER June 2018 www.jewelleryfocus.co.uk £5.95 | ISSN 2046-7265 It was about two years ago that I first began to recognise how passionate the two sides were on the debate about whether hallmarks, if struck in overseas outposts of UK assay offices, should have a specialised mark denoting just that. On the one hand, there were those who felt that any differentiation at all was unnecessary and that those who championed it were driven by bigotry and prejudice. On the other hand, those who denied prejudice and said British hallmarks essentially amounted to a ‘Made in Britain’ mark and that allowing them to be used overseas would erode consumer confidence or at least confuse their perception of what hallmarking means. I report these positions to you from conversations I had personally with well-known names in the jewellery world, but whose anonymity I will protect now that the dust has settled. Why has it settled? Because in recent weeks the British Hallmarking Council announced that marks struck in the British assay offices’ overseas facilities must carry a distinguishing mark to communicate this information to the trade and the consumer. What is notable about the decision and those who made it is their caginess on the subject. In researching our piece this month to explore the decision and what it means, we could not persuade a single assay master (and there are four) to participate in an individual, on-the-record interview. At first, we were astonished – the four most authoritative voices on the matter from a trade perspective refusing to take questions from the trade press raised more questions than we had originally drafted for them. However, with the help of some background comments that I will not print, I was persuaded that the integrity of the British hallmark’s reputation can only be preserved if the assay offices present a unified voice. Even if that voice came not from the assay offices, but from Noel Hunter at the British Hallmarking Council. Whilst the statute does not designate hallmarking as being any indication of ‘Britishness’ – all imported jewellery sold legally in the UK bears it wherever it has come from – it is nonetheless synonymous with the British way, and that is a marketable quality that must be protected. In a way, it was this synonymy that made the original debate so intractable. What if the hallmark has indeed come to mean ‘Made in Britain’ for the consumer? It’s interesting to ponder on, but ultimately now just academic. We have our instructions, and as a trade must now move onto the next challenge. I hope you enjoy the issue. KUNDAN JEWELLERY Could the UK and western markets save this traditional jewellery from dying out? OVERSEAS HALLMARKING TALKING POINT We explore the implications of the recent overseas hallmarking announcement 18 Kundan jewellery page 28 We ask you how consumers’ attitudes to jewellery change in the summer 35 42 JANET FITCH LEONARD ZELL YOUR VIEWS Our columnist’s take on the month’s jewellery trends How to use trigger words when making a sale We sit down with Phil Barnes of Muru Jewellery June 2018 | jewelleryfocus.co.uk MICHAEL NORTHCOTT Editor, Jewellery Focus [email protected] JEWELLERY FOCUS 3