196
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ. 22, 20( 2026)
21 Xu HX, Wang GM, Qi MQ, Lv YY, Gao X, Metamaterial lens made of fully printed resonant-type negative-refractiveindex transmission lines, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 193502( 2013). https:// doi. org / 10.1063 / 1.4804602.
22 Haxha S, AbdelMalek F, Ouerghi F, Charlton MDB, Aggoun A, Fang XJSR, Metamaterial superlenses operating at visible wavelength for imaging applications, Sci. Rep. 8, 16119( 2018). https:// doi. org / 10.1038 / s41598-018-33572-y.
23 Islam MM, Islam MT, Samsuzzaman M, Faruque MRI, Compact metamaterial antenna for UWB applications, Electron. Lett. 51, 1222 – 1224( 2015). https:// doi. org / 10.1049 / el. 2015.2131.
24 Choudhury B, Jha RM, A review of metamaterial invisibility cloaks, Comput. Mater. Contin. 33, 275 – 303( 2013).
25 Krzysztofik WJ, Cao TN: Metamaterials in application to improve antenna parameters, Metamaterials Metasurf. 12, 63 – 85( 2018).
26 Antoniades MA, Zhu J, Selvanayagam M, Eleftheriades GV Compact, wideband and multiband antennas based on metamaterial concepts, in Proc. 4th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag.( IEEE, 2010), pp. 1 – 5.
27 Saeidi T, Ismail I, Wen WP, Alhawari AR, Mohammadi A, Ultra-wideband antennas for wireless communication applications, Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2019, 7918765( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1155 / 2019 / 7918765.
28 Mirbagheri G, Crouse D, Dunn K, Bendoym I, Metamaterials based hyperspectral and multi-wavelength filters for imaging applications, in Image Sensing Technologies VI, Proc. SPIE 10980, 29 – 35( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 12.2522262.
29 Padilla WJ, Averitt RD, Imaging with metamaterials, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 85 – 100( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.1038 / s42254-021-00394-3.
30 Cerniauskas G, Sadia H, Alam P, Machine intelligence in metamaterials design: a review, Oxford Open Mater. Sci. 4, 1( 2024). https:// doi. org / 10.1093 / oxfmat / itae001.
31 Sun S, Dong P, Zhang F, Wang J, Zhu N, Shi Y, Inverse design of ultra-compact multimode waveguide bends based on free-form curves, Laser Photon. Rev. 15, 2100162( 2021). https:// doi. org / 10.1002 / lpor. 202100162.
32 Chen Y, Qiu J, Dong Z, Wang L, Liu Y, Guo H, et al., Inverse design of free-form devices with fabrication-friendly topologies based on structure transformation, J. Lightwave Technol. 41, 4762 – 4776( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / JLT. 2023.3242472.
33 Tsuji Y, Hirayama K, Nomura T, Sato K, Nishiwaki S, Design of optical circuit devices based on topology optimization, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18, 850 – 852( 2006). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / LPT. 2006.871686.
34 Iguchi A, Tsuji Y, Yasui T, Hirayama K, Topology optimal design for optical waveguides using time domain beam propagation method, IEICE Electron. Express 15, 20180417( 2018). https:// doi. org / 10.1587 / elex. 15.20180417.
35 Jakšić Z, Synergy between AI and optical metasurfaces: a critical overview of recent advances, Photonics 11, 442( 2024). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / photonics11050442.
36 Anjum N, Hasan R, Performance benchmarking of machine learning models for terahertz metamaterial absorber prediction, arXiv 2508.08611( 2025). https:// doi. org / 10.48550 / arXiv. 2508.08611.
37 Mora A, Herrera-Ramos G, Ramirez-Gutierrez DL, Sanchez- Ante G, Batres R, Roman-Flores A, et al., Modeling and design of architected structures and metamaterials assisted with artificial intelligence, Mater. Res. Express 11, 122002( 2024). https:// doi. org / 10.1088 / 2053-1591 / ad9dbc.
38 Lingala S, Singarapu S, Dual-mode THz metamaterial absorber: wideband EMI shielding and narrowband biosensing with machine learning integration, Phys. Scr. 100, 125512( 2025). https:// doi. org / 10.1088 / 1402-4896 / ae2573.
39 Han J, Choi J, Park HS, Layout optimization of the gridshaped metamaterial-based resonators for frequency tuning, Dev. Built Environ. 100823( 2025). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. dibe. 2025.100823.
40 Ma C, Wang Z, Zhang H, Yang F, Chen J, Ren Q, et al., Inverse design of electromagnetic metamaterials: from iterative to deep learning-based methods, J. Micromech. Microeng. 34, 053001( 2024). https:// doi. org / 10.1088 / 1361-6439 / ad3a72.
41 Frandsen LH, Elesin Y, Frellsen LF, Mitrovic M, Ding Y, Sigmund O, et al., Topology optimized mode conversion in a photonic crystal waveguide fabricated in silicon-on-insulator material, Opt. Express 22, 8525 – 8532( 2014). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 22.008525.
42 Pita JL, Aldaya I, Dainese P, Hernandez-Figueroa HE, Gabrielli LH, Design of a compact CMOS-compatible photonic antenna by topological optimization, Opt. Express 26, 2435 – 2442( 2018). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 26.002435.
43 Ji W, Chang J, Xu HX, Gao JR, Gröblacher S, Urbach HP, et al., Recent advances in metasurface design and quantum optics applications with machine learning, physics-informed neural networks, and topology optimization methods, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 169( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1038 / s41377- 023-01218-y.
44 Jensen JS, Sigmund O, Topology optimization for nanophotonics, Laser Photon. Rev. 5, 308 – 321( 2011). https:// doi. org / 10.1002 / lpor. 201000014.
45 Backer AS, Computational inverse design for cascaded systems of metasurface optics, Opt. Express 27, 30308 – 30330( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 27.030308.
46 Mansouree M, Arbabi A, Metasurface design using level-set and gradient descent optimization techniques, in: Proc. ACES-Miami 2019( IEEE, 2019).
47 Nanda S, Sahu PK, Mishra RK, Inverse artificial neural network modeling for metamaterial unit cell synthesis, J. Comput. Electron. 18, 1388 – 1399( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1007 / s10825-019-01371-x.
48 Chen Y, Zhu J, Xie Y, Feng N, Liu QH, Smart inverse design of graphene-based photonic metamaterials by an adaptive artificial neural network, Nanoscale 11, 9749 – 9755( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1039 / C9NR01315F.
49 Harper ES, Coyle EJ, Vernon JP, Mills MS, Inverse design of broadband highly reflective metasurfaces using neural networks, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195104( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.1103 / PhysRevB. 101.195104.
50 Choudhury B, Thomas S, Jha RM, Implementation of soft computing optimization techniques in antenna engineering, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 57, 122 – 131( 2015). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / MAP. 2015.2439612.
51 Bacigalupo A, Gnecco G, Lepidi M, Gambarotta L, Machinelearning techniques for the optimal design of acoustic metamaterials, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 187, 630 – 653( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.1007 / s10957-019-01614-8.
52 Beale MH, Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Deep learning toolbox user’ s guide( MathWorks, Natick, 2018).
53 Johnson SG, Joannopoulos JD, Block-iterative frequencydomain methods for Maxwell’ s equations in a planewave