J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ. 21, 31( 2025) 19
enhance their timeliness. It should be noted that the proposed method only uses target detection as a downstream task for validation, which presents certain limitations.
Funding This research did not receive any specific funding.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests to report.
Data availability statement
Some hyperspectral images used in this paper are public data sets commonly used in the field, which can be obtained from the Internet according to the description of the data set in this paper. The remaining dataset was taken by the author themselves and can be obtained or inquired about through email.
Author contribution statement
All authors have reviewed, discussed, and agreed to their personal contributions. The specific situation is as follows: Conceptualization, Bing Zhou; Methodology, Algorithms, and Writing, Lei Deng; Experimental verification, Jiaju Ying; Analysis, Qianghui Wang; Data visualization and Review, Yue Cheng.
References
1 El Abady NF, Zayed HH, Taha M, An efficient technique for detecting document forgery in hyperspectral document images, Alexandria Eng. J. 85, 207 – 217( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. aej. 2023.11.040.
2 Tuya, Graph convolutional enhanced discriminative broad learning system for hyperspectral image classification, IEEE Access 10, 90299 – 90311( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / ACCESS. 2022.3201537. 3 Ma F, Liu SY, Yang FX, Xu GX, Piecewise weighted smoothing regularization in tight framelet domain for hyperspectral image restoration, IEEE Access 11, 1955 – 1969( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / ACCESS. 2022.3233831.
4 Yuen PWT, Richardson M, An introduction to hyperspectral imaging and its application for security, surveillance and target acquisition, Imaging Sci. J. 58, 241 – 253( 2010). https:// doi. org / 10.1179 / 174313110X12771950995716.
5 Lv WJ, Wang XF, Overview of hyperspectral image classification, J. Sens. 2020, 4817234( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.1155 / 2020 / 4817234. 6 Uddin MP, Manun MA, Hossain MA, PCA-based feature reduction for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification, IETE Tech Rev 38, 377 – 396( 2021). https:// doi. org / 10.1080 / 02564602.2020.1740615.
7 Islam MT, Islam MR, Uddin MP, Ulhaq A, A deep learningbased hyperspectral object classification approach via imbalanced training samples handling, Remote Sens. 15, 3532( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs15143532. 8 Rodarmel C, Shan J, Principal component analysis for hyperspectral image classification, Surv. Land Inf. Sci. 62, 115 – 122( 2002).
9 Du Q, Chang CI, Segmented PCA-based compression for hyperspectral image analysis, in Proceedings of the Chemical and Biological Standoff Detection, Vol. 5268( SPIE,
Bellingham, WA, USA, 2004), 274 – 281. https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 12.518835.
10 Hyvärinen EOA, Karhunen J. Independent Component Analysis( Wiley, Hoboken NJ, 2001). ISBN: 9780471221319. https:// doi. org / 10.1002 / 0471221317.
11 Bakken S, Orlandic M, Johansen TA, The effect of dimensionality reduction on signature-based target detection for hyperspectral imaging, SPIE Opt. Eng. Appl. 111310L( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 12.2529141.
12 Falco N, Bruzzone L, Benediktsson JA, An ICA based approach to hyperspectral image feature reduction, Proc. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., 3470 – 3473( 2014). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / IGARSS. 2014.6947229.
13 Zhang ZY, Data Mining Found, in: Intell Paradig, 1st edn., edited by Holmes DE, Lakshmi C( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012). ISBN: 978-3-642-23241-1.
14 Chen G, Qian SE, Evaluation and comparison of dimensionality reduction methods and band selection, Can J Remote Sens 34, 26 – 36( 2008). https:// doi. org / 10.5589 / m08-007.
15 Guan LX, Xie WX, Pei JH, Segmented minimum noise fraction transformation for efficient feature extraction of hyperspectral images, Pattern Recognit 48, 3216 – 3226( 2015). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. patcog. 2015.04.013.
16 Groves P, Bajcsy P, Methodology for hyperspectral band and classification model selection, in: IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data( IEEE, Greenbelt, MD, 2003), pp. 120 – 128. https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / WARSD. 2003.1295183.
17 Du Q, Yang H, Similarity-based unsupervised band selection for hyperspectral image analysis, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 5( 4), 564 – 568( 2008). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / LGRS. 2008.2000619.
18 Su HJ, Sheng YH, Yang H, Du Q, Orthogonal projection divergence-based hyperspectral band selection, Spectroscopy Spectral Anal. 31( 5), 1309 – 1313( 2011). https:// doi. org / 10.3964 / j. issn. 1000-0593( 2011) 05-1309-05.
19 Su HJ, Du Q, Hyperspectral band clustering and band selection for urban land cover classification, Geocarto Int. 27( 5), 395 – 411( 2012). https:// doi. org / 10.1080 / 10106049. 2011.643322.
20 Sun WW, Zhang LP, Du B, Li WY, Mark Lai Y, Band selection using improved sparse subspace clustering for hyperspectral imagery classification, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 8( 6), 2784 – 2797( 2015). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / JSTARS. 2015.2417156.
21 Sun WW, Peng JT, Yang G, Du Q, Correntropy-based sparse spectral clustering for hyperspectral band selection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 17( 3), 484 – 488( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / LGRS. 2019.2924934.
22 Zhu B, Jin Y, Guan XH, Dong YN, SSMM: Semi-supervised manifold method with spatial-spectral self-training and regularized metric constraints for hyperspectral image dimensionality reduction, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform. 136, 104373( 2025). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. jag. 2025.104373.
23 Du PJ, Wang XM, Tan K, Xia JS, Dimensionality reduction and feature extraction from hyperspectral remote sensing imagery based on manifold learning, Geomat. Inform. Sci Wuhan Univ 36( 2), 148 – 152( 2011).
24 Fang Y, Li H, Ma Y, Liang K, Hu YJ, Zhang SJ, Wang HY, Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images based on robust spatial information using locally linear embedding, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11( 10), 1712 – 1716( 2014). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / LGRS. 2014.2306689.