January 2020 January 2020 | Page 27

Comparison of Performance Attributes of a Typical Lithium Battery Compare to a Lead Acid Battery Source: Compilation of information on RELiON and Allied websites Performance Metric Lifetime cycles Maintenance Self-discharge rate Maximum usage (measured as % of full battery charge) Lead Acid 500-750 cycles Need to monitor discharge limit— usually 50% Typically 1/3 t0 ½ of the battery will discharge in 30-40 day period Should not go below 50% of full charge Lithium 3500-5000+ cycles Lithium Advantage 6-10 times longer life No maintenance required Much easier to maintain and to store Only 2%-4% of the battery will dis- charge in a 30-40 day period. Storage over the winter or any signifi- cant non-use period does not present a problem with a lithium battery. Can use 100% of full charge Much more flexible with regard to usage Charge time 8-10 hours 2-3 hours Much reduced time to achieve full charge, plus lithium can be effectively charged from complete discharge e. Makes opportunity charging much more feasible Weight (equivalent power output) 350+ lbs. 70-75 lbs. Significantly less total vehicle weight, which adds to distance on a charge. Market acceptance: The key factor in lithium battery market growth competition, has a common interest in seeing the market grow3. Demonstrably better performance metrics for lithium will be, early-on, mostly “on paper”, and the real test of superiority will come from the experiences of actual users. As noted above, you will have internet access to the comments by the early adopters, and every new product has them. They pave the way for the more reserved, show-me followers. You could put it this way, for mar- ket take-off and early accelerated growth, the necessary condition will be superior performance metrics, as confirmed by the earl adopters, while the sufficient condition will be general market acceptance, fueled the much larger body of consumers that follow. And, I believe the followers will be there, the result of their own research, complemented by objec- tive, educational promotions and advertising. In this case the key manufacturers, Club Car, E-Z-GO, and Yamaha, all have every incen- tive to tout lithium because the technology will clearly energize the PTV market, which is now their main revenue source, displacing fleet golf cars. Of course, the battery man- ufacturers will be promoting their product via YouTube, webinars, and other means. At this stage of market development each battery manu- facturer, despite the fact they are in Transition to the urban mobility market Lithium power will open up a new market for small vehicles, electric powered bikes, scooter, and shut- tles, in urban and suburban environ- ments. I have introduced readers to several of these small vehicles in past articles. Here is another entrant, and it would indeed, fit well in the urban mobility testing ground that is our gated community and its environs. It comes from the Netherlands, is aimed directly at the urban mobil- ity market, and is called the Squad. Here is what my cohort, Marc Cesare at Small Vehicle Resource, has to say about this new market entrant: “Netherlands based Squad Mobility launched their Squad urban mobility vehicle last week. The electric pow- ered Squad features solar cells on the roof, seating for two and a small, rear cargo area. The name Squad is short for solar quadricycle. “The vehicle is designed for the European market and falls under the L6e or light quadricycle category. These vehicles are similar to low speed vehicles in the US. They can’t exceed 28 mph or have a battery pack larger than 4 kWh. The L7e category includes heavier vehicles with a top speed up to 50 mph and a 15 kWh battery pack limit. The vehi- cles have proven to be popular with teenagers and older drivers.” Perhaps designed for the European market, but I would sure like to see them exhibit at the 2020 PGA Show. JANUARY 2020 27