JADE 6th edition | Page 132

132 | JADE KATE BAKER, ELLA TENNANT & FRANK RUTTEN Ella Tennant (Perspectives of the 2016 Annual Teaching Symposium) Keynote - Prof. Paul Kleiman Creativity: choices, challenges (and a bit of chaos) Prof. Kleiman began his talk with a series of vignettes, each one demonstrating that whatever creativity may be, it is often to be found beyond the confines of the standard structures in Higher Education. Using quotations from Martha Graham, Boden and Knight, the audience followed Prof. Kleiman in his search for an understanding of what creativity actually is and the challenge we face in attempting to develop a creative curriculum in Higher Education. The answer appeared to come in the form of questioning the value of evidence-based work and designing open curricula to match a variety of imagined student journeys. Examples of how this might be achieved were mostly from the contexts of business and creative arts institutes. In Higher Education, Prof. Kleiman stated the importance of talking with students and allowing them to be “agents in their own assessments”. There were no details or examples of provided as to how this might work in practice, and how these ideas could be effectively transferred to disciplines which are heavily dependent on evidence-based content was not addressed. It would be difficult to argue with the statement that creativity does need to recognised and rewarded. Innovations in approaches to teaching and learning do assist in providing ideas and the means for educators to ask their own questions and explore the how best to creatively develop curricula for students in their particular discipline. Prof. Kleiman concluded that a creative curriculum is one which is designed for learning, and left us with 10 design principles on which this could be based. The resulting “elegant curriculum” would also contain empty space, which would then presumably allow flexibility to move content to suit students on different journeys. The title for the talk: “Creativity, choices, challenges (and a bit of chaos)”, was appropriate.