IXL Social Enterprise Case Studies Energy January 2012 | Page 4

Revolutionizing the way to make energy affordable for everyone Good lighting gives adults a chance to work more and earn more income By extending the workday, adequate lighting can have a significant positive impact on the productivity and prosperity of individuals, households and communities. In places where opportunities to earn a cash income are relatively scarce, many individuals pursue crafts and operate cottage industries in their homes in the evening. While the materials required for activities like preparing food products, mending clothes or weaving baskets are relatively inexpensive, light can be a major cost for at-home work in the evenings. In the last several decades, projects around the world have demonstrated that access to inexpensive lighting can dramatically improve the profitability of this informal work. For example, a World Bank project in India that tracked the impact over several years of improved lighting solutions in rural communities showed that inexpensive solar lighting improved the income of some households by 15 to 30 percent because of increased home industry output.4 Good lighting leads to more learning The benefits of good lighting are particularly pronounced for students. Schools with quality lighting in communities where good lighting is scarce often have an easier time attracting people, both young and old, to classes and group study sessions after dark. One study in Malawi, for example, showed that improving the lighting in schools can lead to dramatic increases in time spent reading and studying, as well as improved after-hour school usage for additional learning and adult literacy.3 Schools with quality lighting have increased attendance, better teacher retention, and significant improvements in exam scores. Average blackouts per month Guinea Nigeria Congo, Rep. Gambia, the Chad Niger Congo. Dem. Rep. Sierra Leone Benin Madagascar Rwanda Burundi Tanzania Senegal Togo Uganda Burkina Faso Cameroon Ghana Guinea-Bissau Angola Gabon Kenya Lesotho Liberia Ethiopia Cape Verde Algeria Mali Cote d’lvoire Mauritania Zambia Mauritius Mozambique Entrea Swaziland South Africa Botswana Namibia Malawi 34 20 14 14 14 10 10 7 7 7 4 4 4 4 1 2 2 2 2 8 11 11 11 16 23 24 25 26 17 12 12 12 9 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 Mean = 10 Figure 1. Reliability of the African Power Grid Source:WB/IFC Enterprise Analysis Unit (2006-2008) 4