which consider
consciousness itself.
In the meantime, some
scientists are finding
impressive evidence to
suggest that there is
life after
death, or at least survival of consciousness,
although they don’t
know yet how it works.
ence works like that;
for example,
astronomers and astrophysicists can identify
a relationship between
the activity cycles of
the Sun and
the weather on Earth,
so they assume that
this relationship exists
although they don’t
In the meantime, some
scientists are finding
impressive evidence to
suggest that there is life
after death, or at least
survival of consciousness…
This is the reason why
the key is in the brilliant
confession of Professor
Lisa Randall, one of the
most influential scientists in the world: “I
don’t even know what
consciousness is. I’d
like someone to define
consciousness.”
Yes, sometimes sci-
know how it works.
Yet, as Professor Sami
Solanki, of the Max
Planck Institute for
Solar System Research
in Germany, has
stated (http://tinyurl.
com/77taz9c)
:“The
correlation
between
solar cycles and terrestrial weather has not
62
been demonstrated.”
Then why do they study
this “correlation” if it
has not been demonstrated that it really
exists?
The answer
is simple: it is because
they have observed
evidence which suggests that it may be
that way…
Well, it seems
that we are in
a very similar situation
with
studies
about
the afterlife.
Scientists
h a v e
observed evidence which
suggests that
there may be life
after death, but they
don’t know what the
process is or what consciousness is, and they
can’t say that life after
death can be real in
case it really is real!