Irish Chess Journal Diciembre 2010 | Page 12

position. Black finds that he cannot spend time mating White as White can break through on the Queen side and either Queen his a-pawn (thereby forcing Black to take a  perpetual) or else White will himself a perpetual against the  construct Black King. Neither King is safe.  39...Qe1+ 40.Kh2 Qxf2 41.Rxb5 f4  42.Rb7+ It took me a while to decide  on this simple solution. In chess I find  that I am often attracted to the  complex candidate moves first. In type of position that is incorrect  this thinking and the error is in seeking to  find winning lines where Black has a  perpetual. White should have identified quickly that his task is to Time trouble caused this move. force a draw, not to seek a win. Luckily it does not change the Partly my willingness to analyse assessment of equality. Black could complex lines was affected by my try to place a Queen on b2 with a knowledge of Philip. It would be King on c6 and put White in irrelevant to Philip that he had a draw Zugzwang but White has freedom in hand. With the slightest with his King then. Alternatively the opportunity he would play on and Black Queen could perhaps go the look for the win. So the question was King-side but there is no zugzwang whether there were lengthy lines there either as that would leave the where one of us would mis-analyse. Rook free to move. In Black taking Therefore I spent some time on the f-pawn we quickly reach a drawn moves such as Bd6, which although entirely helpless. 29.Rfe1 Ng7 30.Re3? (30.b4!) 30...Nf5 31.Rf3 c5 32.c3 Kb7 33.b4!? cxd4 34.a6+! Kb6 35.cxd4 Qc4 36.Rxf5! gxf5 37.Be7 Qc3 38.Bc5+ Kc7 39.Ra5 Solution to last issue’s problem from The Tactics of End-Games:           R. Reti(1922) White wins After 1.Nd4+ Kc5 White has 2.Kh1!!! Zugzwang! Seán Coffey writes: Two days after the last ICJ issue appeared, I was browsing the archives of Tim Harding’s 12 | P a g e such moves have their merits at times, in this position they simply lose. I eventually settled down to look at the more direct and simpler way forward. 42...Kc8 43.Rf7 Qxh4+ 44.Kg1 Qe1+ 45.Kh2 Qg3+ 46.Kg1 h4 47.Rf8+ Kd7 48.Rf7+ Ke8 49.Rf8+ Kd7 50.Rf7+           With the final point that after ... Kc6, White plays Rb7 and Black has no time to mate White. What I enjoy about playing as talented a player as Philip is that his intentions are always rather clear and none too subtle i.e. to mate you. Getting a draw is often an achievement in itself.... 1/2-1/2 Kibitzer columns at ChessCafe.com, when what do I come across but “Desert Island Chess Books” (June 2001), containing The Tactics of Endgames as one of his ten selections, plus in addition another, relatively obscure, book that I think will be selected by someone else for a future ICJ issue. I was a little taken aback, I have to admit. I certainly knew of and would have chosen The Tactics of Endgames long before that article—Jonathan O’Connor recommended it to me many years ago—but I think I dimly recollect reading Tim’s article before, and I must have mentally filed away the idea of a desert island chess selection. So this note is in belated acknowledgement of the source. In addition, here’s an extra recommendation: the Kibitzer articles contain a wide variety of interesting material, including much of interest to Irish chess, and a complete set, available at http://www.chesscafe.com/archives/archives.htm. The Kibitzer, would be another excellent choice for the castaway. Irish Chess Journal