International Journal on Criminology Volume 2, Number 1, Spring 2014 | Page 11

The Long Arm of Crime and Financial Crisis had alerted the police, incriminating Samy Souied as the probable person behind the threats. Five months later, Samy Souied himself was shot down by two men in front of the Palais des Congrès at Porte Maillot in Paris. He had just landed from Tel Aviv and was due to leave again that same evening. He was carrying €300,000 in cash. The last man who had spoken to him was the former son-in-law of Claude Dray, a hugely-wealthy businessman and art collector, murdered at his mansion house in Neuilly-sur-Seine on the night of October 24/25, 2011. There was nothing that seemingly connected this murder with the previous ones. However, his assassination does raise questions: his safe was full of jewels and other valuables but nothing was stolen. The real gangland bosses are concealed behind these "white collar" swindlers and fraudsters. These men do not forgive errors or oversights. Similarly, the "loveable rogues" of old were not inclined to forgive, and the amounts of money at stake explain this epidemic of old-fashioned 7.65 mm weapon murders. At the beginning of February 2012, the French Court of Auditors covered this affair in its annual report. It stated "the carbon emission quota VAT fraud is the largest tax fraud ever recorded in France in so short a time. It demonstrates failings in regulating a market in which naivety about how resourceful fraudsters can be combines with risk perception errors on the part of market administrators and government. It also highlights the inadequacy in forward planning to provide effective regulation tools for markets in which, given their characteristics, the fraud potential has been overlooked." The Court of Auditors assessed the tax loss to the French autumn 2008 to June 2009 budget at €1.6 billion. Europol estimated the total loss within the European Union at €5 billion. Twenty or so prosecutions have now been brought involving more than a hundred individuals. "Neither the European Commission nor Member States have shown any concern for safeguarding the conditions in which the VAT is collected", stated the Court, which underscored "the original flaws and loopholes in the system: almost unrestricted access by any natural person or corporate entity to national quota registers and the lack of external regulation." It also criticized the "inadequate vigilance on the part of the market administrator, too superficial an applicant identity checking process, unconvincing application of duties of vigilance, market operators perceived the systemic magnitude of the fraud too late, errors and mismanagement on the part of finance ministries." On the subject of TRACFIN, the French financial intelligence unit, the Court of Auditors noted "data processing delays incompatible with swift action to stop fraud". It also criticized the General Directorate for Public Finance for failing to "anticipate" the magnitude of the fraud, stressing that "its standard procedures were not fit for purpose" and "there was inadequate coordination between its different services." Despite acknowledging the May 2009 decision by the Finance Ministry to alter the VAT collection method on CO2 quota transactions to stem Treasury losses, the Court of Auditors reiterated the point that there were still "persistent problems, especially of poor" or inadequate control of access to registers. In short, as usual, the commission of enquiry only exposed what had been known for a long time (the first frauds of this type date back to the 1970s): slow-moving and cumbersome regulatory authority action; existing systems incapable of taking the criminal dimension into account. 9