International Journal of Open Educational Resources Volume 2, Issue 1, Fall 2019/Winter 2020 | Page 36

International Journal of Open Educational Resources able to locate suitable resources for this course, but they did identify OER materials ideal for their 100-level course. They did not have time to rework their 100-level course for Fall 2019, but they anticipate amending their proposal and teaching with OER in a future term. Based on these experiences, it is realistic to incorporate a one-year course implementation period for OER course revisions, beginning after faculty members have completed training. Changes were made to the grant application in Fall 2019 to more specifically identify and reward the types of projects expected to have the highest impact. The new application clarifies the priority of the grant to fund faculty adoption of OER materials in course sections offered on a recurring basis for first-, second-, and third-year students. It now excludes applicants who teach courses that currently utilize OER or have little or no materials costs to students unless the course is substantially revised during the award period (CofC, 2019). Conclusions Overall, faculty perceptions of the OER grant program initiative have been positive. Faculty stated that they found the program to provide an opportunity to reduce costs for students, add flexibility in course design by using open-access digital materials, and provide instructors with the opportunity to utilize current content not generally available in printed textbooks. Instructors found this particularly germane in technology-focused classes. Some instructors were overwhelmed by the number of resources available for their discipline but stated that working with a librarian on their specific learning goals and sharing resources with others was a valuable part of the experience. Grant recipients reported that they found the grant program useful and indicated that it encouraged them to take a new approach to their course design. In particular, the CoI model appears to be a useful approach for a faculty development program. By considering each element—teaching, social, and cognitive presence—librarians facilitated a full educational experience for faculty, who in turn are better equipped to facilitate the same for their students. There are early indications that the OER grant program has impacted educational experiences at the classroom level. For example, one participant teaching a Women’s and Gender Studies course was motivated to apply for a grant because she wanted to reduce the cost burden for her students. In an October 2019 interview shared on CofC’s private social media site for faculty and staff (Rose, 2019), she shared that she initially felt intimidated by some of the technical terms and technology being discussed by other participants in the course. Once she completed the course and began experimenting with her course redesign, however, she found herself incorporating more and more non-traditional resources and technology components, such as blogs and videos. She even created a website to contain her syllabus and all class readings, making her course content fully open 28