International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 1(1), September, 2014 Fatal craniocerebral injuries in victims who survi | Page 4

Fatal craniocerebral injuries in victims who survived for some period injury relationship with skull bone fracture except this present study. Marks PV and Lavy CBD [17] observed that age to be a major determinant of the d degree of recovery following fatal head injury, stating: younger the age group better will be the prognosis. Though it is partly true with the present study also, we observed a strong relationship between the brain stem injury and the case fatality. Amongst the brain stem injury cases also, those showing primary brainstem rimary injury were found to be more fatal. This finding is also in agreement with the findings of Shukla D et al [5], Pilz P et al [18] and Simpson DA et al al. [19]. Conclusion l Fatal craniocerebral injury cases constitute considerable size of morbidity and mortality in our study centre. Incidence of brain stem injury in such a case is also very high. RTA involving the pedestrians and two wheelers users was the single most important cause of fatal craniocerebral injuries. In majority of the cases raniocerebral the primary brainstem lesions have been associated with basal skull fractures whereas majority of the secondary brainstem lesions were associated with vault fractures. Involvement of brain stem, primarily pr primary brain stem injury, was found to be an important factor determining the survival and prognosis of the victim. Acknowledgement Authors acknowledge the immense help received from the scholars whose articles are cited and included in references of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to authors / editors /publishers of all those articles, journals and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed. References 1. Tedeschi CG, Eckert WG, Tedeschi LG. In “Forensic Medicine: A study in trauma and environmental hazards, Vol. I, Mechanical Trauma “section 1, Mechanical Injury: Chapter 3: Head injury, WB Saunders Co. Philadelphia, 1977, p 30. 2. Amit M P, Walter F Vaz. Pattern of Fatal Blunt Head Injury: A Two Year Retrospective / Prospective Medico ective Legal Autopsy Study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 2010; 32(2):144 32(2):144-149. 3. Available at: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/d ocs/report_head_injuries.html. ocs/report_head_injuries Accessed on 08.05.2013. ccessed 4. Kumar A, Lalwani S, Agrawal D, Rautji R, Dogra TD. Fatal road traffic accidents and their relationship with head injuries: An epidemiological survey of five years. IJNT, 2008; 5(2): 63-67. 67. 5. Shukla D, Mahadevan A, Sastry KVR., Shankar SK. Pathology of post traumatic brainstem and hypothalamic injuries, Clinical Neuropathology, 2007; 26(5): cal 197-209. 6. Tyagi AK, Sharma G Bishnu K. Cranio GK, cerebral damage by blunt force impact: J Indian Acad Forensic Med, 1986; 1: 2439. 7. Akang EEU, Okati MAO, Osunkaya AO, Komolate EO, Malomo AO, Shokunbi MT, Amutta SB. Pattern of fatal head B. injuries in Ibadan – A 10 year review, Medicine Science and Law, 2002; 42(2): 160-166. 8. Johnson MR, McCarthy MC, Miller SF, People JB. Craniofacial trau trauma in injured motorcyclists: The impact of helmet usage. J Trauma, 1995; 38(6): 876-8. 9. Menon A, Pai VK, Rajeev A. Pattern of fatal head injuries due to vehicular International Archives of Integrated Medicine, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, September, 2014. Copy right © 2014, IAIM, All Rights Reserved. Page 4