Instituto Mexicano de Economía del Comportamiento CONTRIBUCIONES CONTRA LA CORRUPCIÓN | Page 17

Referencias
1. Abbink, K. (2002), ‘Fair salaries and the moral costs of corruption.’ Working Paper (CeDEx 2002-5, University of
Nottingham).
2. Abbink, K. (2004), ‘Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: an experimental study.’ European Journal of Polit-
ical Economy. Issue 20(4), pp. 877-906.
3. Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., Jain, T., (2013), ‘Letting the Briber Go Free: An Experiment on Miti-
gating Harassment Bribes’. Indian School of Business WP ISB-WP/104/2012
4. Abbink, K., Hennig-Schmidt, H. (2006), ‘Neutral versus loaded instructions in a bribery experiment.’ Experimen-
tal Economics. Issue 9 (2), pp. 103-121.
5. Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., Renner, E. (2002), ‘An experimental bribery game.’ Journal of law, economics and or-
ganization. Issue 18(2), pp. 103- 121.
6. Alatas, V., Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L. (2009), ‘Subject pool effects in a corruption ex-
perimentÑ a comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students.’ Experimental Economics, Issue
12(1): 113-132.
7. Armantier, O., Boly, A. (2008) ‘Can corruption be studied in the lab? Comparing a field and a lab experiment.’
CIRANO - Scientific Publications No. 2008s-26.
8. Barr, A., Lindelow, M., Serneels, P. (2009), ‘Corruption in public service delivery: an experimental analysis’. Jour-
nal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Issue 72(1), pp. 225-239.
9. Barr, A., Serra, D. (2009), ‘The effects of externalities and framing on bribery in a petty corruption experiment.’
Experimental Economics. Issue 12(4), pp. 488-503.
10. Barr, A., Serra, D. (2010), ‘Corruption and culture: an experimental analysis.’ Journal of Public Eco-
nomics, Issue 94 (11-12), pp. 862-869.
11. Bilotkach, V. (2006), ‘A tax evasion – bribery game: experimental evidence from Ukraine’. European
Journal of Comparative Economics. Issue 3(1), pp. 31-49.
12. Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Nisvan, E., Gangadharan, L. (2009), ‘Propensities to engage in and pun-
ish corrupt behaviour: experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore.’ Journal of
Public Economics, Issue 93(7/8), pp. 843-851.
13. Dong, B., Dulleck, W. and Torgler, B. (2012) ‘Conditional corruption.’ Journal of Economic Psychology,
Issue 33, pp. 609-627.
14. Drugov, M., Hamman, J., Serra, D. (2011), ‘Intermediaries in corruption: an experiment.’ Mimeo, Flor-
ida State University