Innovate Issue 1 November 2019 | Page 28

LEARNING TO LEARN The survey did provide evidence that strategies are being used to encourage students to see matters from different perspectives. For example, students are encouraged to participate in discussions considering the ethics of genetically modifying organisms or using stem cells. One teacher noted that students might be encouraged to consider whether an expert’s opinion is valid. Another teacher listed open-ended questions they used in their lessons which reflected the Socratic questioning technique suggested to develop critical thinking skills. Furthermore, students are encouraged to use more than one source of information when carrying out research, encouraging them to consider possible different perspectives. Students are also being encouraged to reflect on their own experiences within the Sciences, for example by evaluating a conclusion they have formed. This is a formally assessed skill in Biology Middle School investigations and Science IAs. For consideration Reassuringly, there is evidence to suggest that many of the skills required of critical thinkers are being encouraged by our Science teachers. That said, it seems these skills may be taught as part of the scientific method, rather a directed effort to develop critical thinking itself in students. In other words, critical thinking skills might be a by-product of our students successfully implementing the scientific method. Consequently, some critical thinking skills may receive more attention than others, which could explain why the written staff surveys did not explicitly outline any current strategies for encouraging students to consider the strength of evidence they have for theories. References As courses exist within the school for all year groups which directly focus on the development of critical thinking skills (Systems of Belief, 10 Ideas, Critical Perspectives, Theory of Knowledge), the need for Science subjects to do so is debatable. However, it may be worth noting Nygren et al.’s (2019) suggestions that student capacity for critical thinking in one subject does not necessarily mean this can be transferred to another subject. If this holds true, and the school wants to ensure students can exhibit critical thinking skills in the context of Science, then there is an argument for developing a clearer focus on integrating the teaching of critical thinking into Science schemes of work. Copeland, M. (2015). SOCRATIC CIRCLES: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Stenhouse Publishers. Finally, this research has highlighted that some of the teaching staff body would like to know more about critical thinking. Disseminating information, with examples of strategies for developing the skills required for critical thinking, is likely to reassure teachers that they are already equipping students with many of the necessary skills to help them become proficient critical thinkers. Vejar, C. (2017). Critical Thinking: An Academic Perspective. Salem Press Encyclopedia. 26 Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Development and Validation of an Integrated Assessment Instrument to Assess Students’ Analytical Thinking Skills in Chemical Literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11416a Belluigi, D. Z., & Cundill, G. (2017). Establishing enabling conditions to develop critical thinking skills: a case of innovative curriculum design in Environmental Science. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 950–971. https://doi.org/10. 1080/13504622.2015.1072802 Butcher, B. Y. K. R., Larson, M., & Lane, M. (2019). Using Structured Documentation to Enhance Effective Reasoning and Communication. Science Scope, 44–53. Chatfield, T. (2018). Critical Thinking: Your Guide to Effective Argument, Successful Analysis and Independent Study. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Erikson, M. G., & Erikson, M. (2018). Learning outcomes and critical thinking – good intentions in conflict. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi. org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813 Kinslow, A., & Sadler, T. (2018). Making Science Relevant. The Science Teacher, 086(01), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst18_086_01_40 Nygren, T., Haglund, J., Samuelsson, C. R., Af Geijerstam, Å., & Prytz, J. (2019). Critical thinking in national tests across four subjects in Swedish compulsory school. Education Inquiry, 10(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.20 18.1475200 Solbes, J., Torres, N., & Traver, M. (2018). Use of socio-scientific issues in order to improve critical thinking competences. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 1–23. Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing Pseudoscientific and Paranormal Beliefs in University Students Through a Course in Science and Critical Thinking. Science and Education, 27(1–2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9956-0 Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Rosyida, F., Kurniawati, Z. L., Sholihah, M., & Ismirawati, N. (2018). Using remap-TmPS learning to improve low-ability students’ critical thinking skills. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 1–29.