COMPETITION
In practice, this means companies should act proactively: issuing immediate“ no deletion” instructions, briefing employees on their roles and rights, and supervising forensic processes to ensure respect for privacy. It also means avoiding tactics that, while technically legal, undermine trust- such as over- claiming privilege or delaying searches. Ethics and compliance are not separate tracks; they are intertwined, and together they shape outcomes.
16
3.2. Ethics is a Two-Way Street Ethical standards in dawn raids do not apply solely to companies- they bind authorities as well. Enforcement agencies are expected to uphold fairness, transparency, and respect for rights throughout the inspection process. This includes accurate documentation of interviews, proportionality in evidence gathering, and adherence to the scope of the investigation. The Intermarché case illustrates this vividly: the Commission’ s failure to properly record supplier interviews was not only a procedural flaw but an ethical lapse in truth-tracking, ultimately leading to annulment of the raids.
For companies, ethics elevates compliance from“ not obstructing” to actively safeguarding integrity, people, and due process. In practice, this means providing clear and accurate answers rather than technically correct but evasive ones; protecting dignity through non-retaliation and whistleblower safety; applying genuine data minimization by segregating personal information and explaining proportionate redactions; and avoiding grey-zone tactics such as unnecessary delays or tactical privilege claims. Ethical behavior also extends to transparent briefings so employees understand their roles and support channels, and post-raid aftercare through blameless reviews and shared learnings.
The contrast is clear: conduct that is both legal and ethical- such as immediate preservation of chats and emails, full request-response logs,- builds trust.“ Legal but unethical” actions, like keyword gaming or blanket privilege claims, erode credibility, while unlawful and unethical acts- such as deleting messages or hiding devices- invite severe sanctions.
Operationalizing ethics requires tone from the top, robust training, clear escalation maps, and disciplined after-action reviews. When both companies and authorities embrace
these principles, dawn raids become not only a compliance exercise but a demonstration of integrity on both sides.
3.3. Understanding the Human Factor in Obstruction Not all instances of obstruction during dawn raids stem from an intent to conceal competition law infringements. Sometimes, employees hesitate to grant access to certain communications for reasons unrelated to antitrust concerns. For example, a WhatsApp group might contain sensitive discussions among staff documenting workplace harassment or other internal issues they fear could be exposed to their superiors. In such cases, resistance is driven by personal protection rather than corporate misconduct.
This reality underscores the importance of clear communication and confidentiality assurances from authorities. Employees should be informed that data collection will be limited to information relevant to the investigation and that personal or sensitive content will be handled with discretion. Guaranteeing confidentiality and applying robust data minimization principles can reduce anxiety, prevent panic-driven deletions, and foster cooperation. Ethical enforcement, therefore, requires not