Ingenieur Vol.81 January-March 2020 | Page 61

of Engineers Regulations 1990 (Revised 2015) [19]". The need to regulate the complete engineering team, Engineers, Engineering Technologists (ET) and Engineering Technicians has also led the BEM to amend the REA to incorporate two new categories: Engineering Technologists and Inspector of Works (IOW), also known as Engineering Technicians. Profession, Entry-Routes and Professionalisation Bravenboer and Lester [20] states that professions can be defined very roughly as occupations that set their qualifying requirements at the equivalent of a degree level or above, and are normally (though not universally) subject to some form of authoritative membership of an association or regulatory body. An AML equivalence to a degree level is listed in the Malaysian Government portal of Malaysian Public Services Commission [21]. An AML holder’s competency in aircraft maintenance engineering is certified by CAAM prior to issuing the individual with his/her AML and therefore it fits into the criteria as a profession. Bravenboer and Lester further elaborated that the dominant pattern of professional entry during the latter half of the 20 th century can be described as a sequential model, where the would-be practitioner learns first the “science” or disciplinary knowledge underpinning the profession, followed by its “applied science” or tools and techniques, and finally its practice [22][23]. This sequential model is similar to the model of AML holders’ training and education through compliance to the guidelines of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) [24] and CAAM AN 1101 [1]. Not only does it consist of fundamentals of science in aircraft engineering with their application in the aircraft maintenance, field practical experience is also critically assessed. McDavid & Huse [25] outlined key mechanisms for facilitating professionalisation that are a possible pathways for the American Evaluation Association (AEA) to consider. The first procedure that has been discussed in evaluation since the 1990s, and frequently implemented in higher education, is accreditation. Usually, accreditation is a mechanism for assessing university programmes, led by an external panel that grades the institution on several specific criteria (e.g., faculty, courses, and student competencies). Upon receiving accreditation, the university programme is granted a formal document indicating that it is accredited for a fixed period of time. Even though the accreditation of AML training programmes is under the jurisdiction of CAAM Part 147 [26], there are many similarities with the process of accreditation. The main difference is that instead of accreditation being issued for several years by a professional body or institution of higher learning (IHL), CAAM approval is usually valid for 12 months only before it is due for a renewal audit. The constant annual audit is a result of compliance to the strict guidelines in complying with ICAO standards. According to professionalisation studies conducted by McDavid & Huse, another possible procedure is certification, which attests to a person’s skills and competencies in a field, assessed by a professional society through formal examination. This echoes with the intention of this study in mapping an AML holder’s education, training and practice in the aircraft maintenance engineering field by BEM in order to provide professional recognition. This process also augurs well for CAAM AML holders as BEM is an independent statutory body that may provide professional certification. Established Profession – Professional Code of Conduct According to Freeman [27], one of the key elements in identifying a full blown profession, recognised widely by both the general public and professionals, is the existence within that profession of an effective code of professional conduct. Though currently AML holders are considered expert by virtue of the AML that one holds, the absence of a professional code of conduct (CoC) and ethics appears to be a reality. Freeman [27] elaborated that the possession of a CoC is seen by most professional bodies as a sine qua none of professional status: Having a CoC has come to be seen by many as a mark of professional status. Those who feel that their type of occupation is undervalued by the public, have come to see the adoption of a CoC as one means by which to raise the public image of their profession. Though it may not be primarily for the cause of raising public image, LAMEs certified as professionals who comply with a code of conduct 59