INGENIEUR
assigned by the internal experts produced more
reasonable values expected for very low, moderate
and very high vulnerability classes compared with
the weights obtained from the stakeholders. The
final landslide cluster, indicators, sub-indicators
and weight values obtained from the internal
experts successfully improved the initial data. The
key approach towards development of a reliable
and practical landslide vulnerability assessment
is to use the easily identified, measurable and
most significant indicators. These were proven
scientifically from the analysis of sensitivity of
indicators and sub-indicators for the particular
critical infrastructure.
REFERENCE
Bendimerad, F. (2001). Loss estimation: a
powerful tool for risk assessment and mitigation.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21,
467-472
Eidsvig, U.M.K., Papathoma-Köhle, M., Du, J.,
Glade, T., & Vangelsten, B.V. (2014). Quantification
of model uncertainty
Eidsvig, U. M. K., McLean, A., Vangelsten, B. V.,
Kalsnes, B., Ciurean, R. L., Argyroudis, S.,Winter,
M. G., Mavrouli, O. C., Fotopoulou, S., Pitilakis,
K., Baills, A., Malet, J.-P. & Kaiser, G. 2014.
Assessment of socioeconomic vulnerability to
landslides using an indicator-based approach:
methodology and case studies. Bulletin of
Engineering Geology and the Environment, 73,
307-324
Fuchs, S., Tsao, T.-C., & Keiler, M. (2012).
Quantitative vulnerability functions for use in
mountain hazard risk management - the challenge
of transfer.
Jabatan Kerja Raya (CKC) (2008), Final Landslide
Investigation Report-Investigation of Slope Failure
at Taman Bukit Mewah, Bukit Antarabangsa, Hulu
Klang, Selangor, Laporan No. JKR 21500-0008-
09, December 2008
Jabatan Mineral dan Geosains (2002), Laporan
gelonsoran tanah serta batuan di Kampong
Sri Gunung Pulai, Pontian, Johor Darul Takzim,
Laporan No. JMG.JHR: (GS) 1/2002, JMG Negeri
Johor, Jun 2002.
6
64
VOL
2019
VOL 80
55 OCTOBER-DECEMBER
JUNE 2013
Kumpulan IKRAM Sdn. Bhd. (2002), Soil
Investigation Work & Soil Instrumentation Work
Gunung Pulai Slope Failure Johor Bahru, Johor
Darul Takzim, Bil. Laporan 080/02, IKRAM
Selatan, Julai 2002.
Lo, W.-C., Tsao, T.-C., & Hsu, C.-H. (2012). Building
vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: A preliminary
study.
Majlis Perbandaran Ampang Jaya (MPAJ), 1994.
Report of the Technical Committee of Investigation
on the Collapse Block 1 and the stability of Blocks
2 and 3 Highland Towers Condominium, Hulu
Klang, Selangor Darul Ehsan.
Mazzorana, B., & Fuchs, S. (2010). Fuzzy Formative
Scenario Analysis for woody material transport
related risks in mountain torrents. Environmental
Modelling & Software, 25, 1208-1224
Mohd Asbi & Associates Sdn Bhd. (2005). Surface
investigation report on proposed cut slope
between Ch 23+000 and Ch 24+560 Simpang
Pulai - Gua Musang - Kuala Berang package 2,
Malaysia. Report to Ministry of works Malaysia
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Zischg, A., Fuchs, S.,
Glade, T., & Keiler, M. (2015). Loss estimation
for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated
toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage
documentation. Environmental Modelling &
Software, 63, 156-169
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Gems, B., Sturm, M., &
Fuchs, S. (2017). Matrices, curves and indicators:
A review of approaches to assess physical
vulnerability to debris flows. Earth-Science
Reviews, 171, 272-288
Remondo, J., Bonachea, J., & Cendrero, A. (2008).
Quantitative landslide risk assessment and
mapping on the basis of recent occurrences.
Geomorphology, 94, 496-507.
Shu, Y.K., Chow, W. S. & Zakaria, M. 1981. Rockfall
danger related to limestone hills in the Kinta Valley,
Perak. Annual Report 1981, Geological Survey of
Malaysia: 184-197.
Uzielli, M., Nadim, F., Lacasse, S., & Kaynia, A.M.
(2008). A conceptual framework for quantitative
estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides.
Engineering Geology, 102, 251-256