Ingenieur Vol 76 ingenieur 2018 October | Page 70

INGENIEUR Contracting for Performance - 3 rd Generation Performance Based Contract By Datuk Ir. Kamarulzaman Zainal Senior Associate, TDA Berhad, PBC Center of Reference T he Malaysian Government, as an asset owner, invests huge sums of money to develop the nation as part of its service and social fulfilment to the rakyat. In certain sectors, the investments involve acquisition of strategic moveable assets that are expensive, sophisticated, complex and have long life cycles. This is especially prevalent in the defence/ security and transportation sectors where fleets of aircrafts, naval vessels, armoured vehicles, rolling stocks, ships and boats are purchased from time to time for various agencies. Private asset owners do the same but largely for business purposes. To ensure the high value investments provide the expected return, Government assets such as the above platforms/systems must be managed and maintained efficiently so that they can operate at optimum levels to perform their intended purposes throughout their entire life. Sustainment of systems capability (Capability Sustainment) is therefore an important function that an asset owner must undertake, either internally or through outsourcing. If the function is to be undertaken internally, the associated capability sustainment costs will be borne directly by the owner. If it is outsourced, the owner can procure the services from a contractor to perform the required maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) as well as other logistic support tasks on the whole fleet, or sub-system of the fleet, or certain parts/ components of the fleet. Most Government contracts related to life- cycle support of moveable assets today are transactional or prescriptive-based where payment to the contractor is determined based on “process”, i.e man-hours and materials consumed to perform the work. However, after successful 6 68 VOL 2018 VOL 76 55 OCTOBER-DECEMBER JUNE 2013 Figure 1: The evolution of PBC implementation on several contracts since 2012, the 3 rd Generation Performance Based Contract (PBC) is gaining the trust of Government buyers as the preferred method for contracting for performance. PBC GEN 3 There is nothing new about PBC as the basic methodology has been used in many contracts previously. KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) remain the main performance measure in a PBC that will determine how the contractor performed and how they will be paid. The 3 rd Generation PBC however, has new features that are not yet exposed to many. The evolution of PBC, as shown in Figure 1, has come to a point where additional performance measures are introduced to evaluate other dimensions of a contractor’s performance